This is NOT a review. These are some points which I felt are necessary to discuss. The term ‘Coming of age’ is, quintessentially, Hindi cinema. The hero, not always necessarily a very young man, is almost always jobless and does not have much maturity in understanding his responsibilities. Yet, the heroine still falls for him. And by the time the movie ends, we get to see the transformation of this hero into a more mature, understanding-his-responsibilities who gets-the-girl man! If this is not ‘coming of age’, then what is? It’s just that our filmmakers have been more forthcoming and liberal in using the tag ‘coming of age’ in the last few years.
The basic premise of Wake Up Sid is not exactly ground-breaking. Sid, a spoilt but privileged college student, with no sense of purpose or responsibilities, wakes up to life after interacting with Aisha. The only ‘hatke’ thing here is that Aisha, the heroine, is older and supposedly more mature than him.
Right from the initial scene, when we see Sid, the film travels to known territory. Sid is least interested in his studies and thinks that life is a big party. His rich parents don’t seem to be too bothered and happily pay his credit card bills. Firstly, why is it that, urban, rich kids are always shown to be so confused with life? Also, why is it that, neither of Sid’s parents say anything to him when they are aware that he his least bit interested in his studies? Isn’t education of any importance to them? Especially so, when we hear Sid’s mother complaining that Sid was a good student in school. Yet, she chooses to be a doting mother who has nothing to say. Also why do most fathers try and bribe their kids with a Porsche (or a Mercedes or BMW) to join their business when they have just finished their degree (B.Com in the case of this movie)?
These things are highly questionable.
Now let’s focus on Aisha. She has come to Mumbai all the way from Kolkata to start her life. She says, she has no friends, or family here. Yet, and just after a couple of days in Mumbai, she manages to get an apartment of her own. The transformation of that apartment into a designer suite is hard to take seriously. We see Aisha along with Sid and his friends painting the apartment on their own because Aisha cannot afford much money. Yet, the drapes used in the apartment are of designer quality. She uses a Mac but cannot afford a washing machine. Details, anyone? These things just don’t fit in. I wonder if everyone has to look his or her best and stay in the best possible places no matter what their backgrounds are just because it is a Karan Johar movie!!
After Sid moves out of the house and stays with Aisha, not even once do we get to see a scene where his parents call him up and persuade him to come back home. Is that normal? Much later, we do see his mother coming to the apartment, and offering Aisha money instead of actually staying back till Sid comes and persuading him to return back to their house. Nor do we see a single scene where Sid’s parents are concerned about Sid abandoning them and the house. Aren’t they bothered at all?
One might say that some things are obvious and if explained, will be akin to spoon-feeding. I agree, too. But if that is the case, then why write a screenplay with a clichéd story. Isn’t a dad’s trying to bribe his son with a car clichéd? Isn’t showing a doting mother saying nothing to her spoilt son clichéd?
So far my article might seem to be a rant. Yes, it is. It is a sin to have such an ordinary first half that is so full of clichés for a movie whose second half is just brilliant! The treatment of the second half where we see two parallel coming-of-age stories is just exceptional. That completely elevates this movie and makes the movie a decent enough watch.
The movie benefits immensely from the technical department. The cinematography by Anil Mehta makes Bombay look beautiful. The background score elevates the movie. Amit Trivedi rocks with 'Iktara'.
But what makes the movie are the performances. Ranbir Kapoor just nails it. He IS Sid. It is tough to share screen space with the most talented actress of our times - Konkona Sen Sharma. But Ranbir actually does exceptionally well. Konkona is always good. She can never be even average. But the surprise package of the movie is Shikha Talsania who plays Sid's friend Laxmi. She is just so natural.
Anupam Kher and Supriya Pathak are wasted as their role is far too cliched. But what is Rahul 'the stud who never gets the girl' Khanna doing here? It is the same role he did in Love Aaj Kal.
The direction of Ayan Mukherji is so assured. It is a pity that his script doesn’t quite compliment his directorial skills. Had he worked on the script a bit more, we could have had one of the best “coming of age” movies of our times.
I guess he needs to ‘wake up’ now! Or is it Karan Johan who needs to wake up?
.jpg)
