Life

Love, Sex Aur Dhokha Review

2010-03-20T11:47:00.004+05:30

Films are supposed to be mirror of the society. Does it really reflect the true India? Most Indian films create a utopia of their own where everything is fair in love. But is it the truth? Does that really happen?

Welcome to the world of Love, Sex Aur Dhokha. Get a reality check!

The movie showcases the dysfunctional urban Indian society which lusts for voyeurism. It is the Indian society which starts and ends the day with MMS scandals. It is also the Indian society which believes in honor killing because of religious differences and caste issues. So far we read it all on newspapers. Thankfully, someone had enough balls to put in on celluloid.

Told from third person point of view, using camcorder, CCTV and hidden camera, the movie tells three inter-weaved stories about Love, Sex and Deceit. On a macro level, the three stories talk about Love, Sex and Deceit chronologically and separately. But on a micro level, we will find all the elements in every story.

The films makes a very strong socio-political statement. Albeit sarcastic, it talks about a nation which is shinning thanks to its technological progress but yet has not been able to come out of the wonderland portrayed in films where almost everything is over the top and melodramatic. Where wannabe filmmakers rather than trying to create something new, fresh, follow the easy path to attain box-office success. It also talks about the paradox of morality. A nation which gave birth to Kamasutra, where most people take sadistic pleasure watching the MMS scandals everyday, but cannot talk about sex in open. The irony is, one such scene where a couple is having sex is pixellated by the censor board even after giving an Adults Only rating.

The master stroke was to cast all newcomers. And all of them performed brilliantly. Be it Angshuman Jha as the wannabe director, Shruti as the rich girl in love with her poor director, Raj Kumar Yadav as the good for nothing guy managing the departmental store and who is in huge debt, Neha Chauhan as the graveyard shift worker in that departmental store, Arya Banerjee as the dancer who is desperate to get herself cast in a music video, Herry Tangri as the pop icon a popstar who keeps candybars in his portable fridge right below the whiskey or Amit Sial as the journalist desperately in need of a breaking news.

What however enhances the movie even more are the stunning cinematography by Nikos Andritsakis and deft editing by Namrata Rao. Using hand held camera, CCTV footage, hidden camera he creates a jerky, muddled world just like that in the film.

The strength of Dibakar Banerjee has always been his script, especially the dialogs. Be it the bitter-sweet title cards at the beginning of each story, the security guard at the store who just doesn't know when to stop or the departmental store worker who just can't stop bragging about her boyfriend in Russia. Everything bears the signature of Dibakar Banerjee. Also that he mainly talks about middle class people whom clearly he understand. In Love, Sex Aur Dhokha too baring one protagonist, all others belong to middle class or lower middle class. Here too he creates a platter of real characters with real emotions. The society they live in is dysfunctional, but their narrative is seamless.

And then there is the outstanding last scene where all the protagonists are in one scene. The camera lingers on with everyone smiling, rejoicing and the reality suddenly hits you. The happiest scene of the entire film gives you the biggest scare. You start recollecting what happened to those characters almost like finishing the jigsaw.

Love, Sex Aur Dhokha gave Indian cinema a new genre, itself.

Take a bow Dibakar Banerjee. If not now, then when?

The Way We Were

2009-12-30T23:52:00.000+05:30

The first time I saw you
I fell head over heels for you
Smitten by your beauty and simplicity
I really wanted to be with you

Slowly, our bonding grew
As days passed by
I was sure; I was in love with you
So I said lets give it a try

We were so happy together
Talking, hugging, kissing, spending time with each other
I was so proud of us
We were the best couple ever

Nothing came in between us
We never fought
All we knew was to love each other
Happiness was all what it brought

As time passed by, we became busy
You had your studies, I had mine
We were growing apart slowly, like arsenic poisoning
I felt helpless, watching love fading away in due time

We started fighting over small issues
You couldn't stand my jokes
I couldn't stand your sentiments
I thought – was this due?

Kissing stopped, hugging stopped
We barely talk with each other
Is this why we fell in love?
Or is this the phase every relation goes through?
I don't know; I don't care
I just want to be with you - Just like The Way We Were

Top 10 under-rated Hindi films of the decade

2009-12-25T17:14:00.001+05:30

After writing the 10 most under-rated English movies of the decade, it was quite obvious for me to write an article about the under-rated Hindi movies. More so since I felt it will be much easier to write. How wrong I was! Everytime I finished my list, another movie came in my mind out of nowhere and I had to insert it to the list. At a time I had some 35 movies and boy it was confusing. So after two days of pulling my hair out, the list below was formed. Just hope I didn't miss any serious contender.

All the films mentioned are selected on the basis that they did poorly at the Box Office.

Chronologically:

1. Haasil (2003)

Reasons:

Irrfan Khan alone makes this movie a must watch. What a performance!

A completely different landscape compared to regular Hindi films. Allahabad has not been used much as a Hindi cinema backdrop. Also the college politics in UP is not shown much on Hindi cinema. A very novel idea.

A talent called Tigmanshu Dhulia. What a debut for him! Such assured scripting and direction.
Although there isn’t much scope of music, still ‘Aankhen Bhi Hoti Hain Dil Ki Zuban’ is an awesome track.

The poignant moments captured between Tinnu Anand and Jimmy Shergill. Natural to the core.
Lastly, but most importantly, the hero is called Aniruddha. How can I not LOVE the movie?

2. Raincoat (2004)

Reasons:

Simplicity. Simple can be lyrical and beautiful. This movie proves it.
Career best performance of Aishwarya Rai. Superb performances by Ajay Devgan and Annu Kapoor.
Debojyoti Mishra’s brilliant soundtrack and background score elevates the movie.
Abhik Mukhopadhyay’s cinematography and how he plays with the light and shadow.
Lastly, the sensitivity and maturity with which Rituparno Ghosh directs the movie.

3. Naach (2004)

Reasons:

Ram Gopal Varma.
His most personal film till date. It is dark, moody and abstract.
Add to that brilliant performances by Antara Mali and Abhishek Bachchan.
Outstanding cinematography by Kiran Reddy.
Enough said. Move on.

4. Matribhoomi (2005)

Reasons:

Manish Jha. Just for the balls to make this film.
Venu Gopal’s cinematography. The bleak and dark look shows how the society is loveless and depraved.
The cast. Tulip Joshi, Sudhir Pandey, Sushant Singh and Piyush Mishra gives splendid performances.

5. Hazaaron Khwaishein Aisi (2005)

Reasons:

The sheer innovation of the story, script. The locales.
Bavra Mann, one of the finest songs of the decade.
A genius called Sudhir Mishra. To create one of the finest love stories of Hindi cinema.
To bring the drop dead gorgeous Chitrangada Singh on celluloid. Add to that Kay Kay and Shiny’s performance.
A special thanks to Pritish and Rangita Nandy for giving me my favorite movie of the decade.

6. Main, Meri Patni Aur Woh (2005)

Reasons:

For probably the best and most natural climax of the decade.
To showcase the talent that Rajpal Yadav has.
Add to that great performances by Rituparna Sengupta, Kay Kay, Varun Badola and Vinod Nagpal.
Chandan Arora. For bringing back the Hrishikesh Mukherjee and Basu Chatterji style of romance and humor.

7. My Brother Nikhil (2005)

Reasons:

The best and most sensitive film on gay relationships and HIV+ patients in India till date.
Le Chale, one of the best songs I have heard.
Sanjay Suri. For producing a movie like this and giving the best performance of his life.
For Juhi Chawla, Victor Banerjee, Lilette Dubey and PurabKohli, each giving heartbreaking performances.
Lastly, Onir for making this film with so much sensitivity.

8. Sehar (2005)

Reasons:

Arshad Warsi’s best performance till date.
For once, the characters speak with proper dialect (UP-ite Hindi here).
The supporting cast comprising of Pankaj Kapoor, Suhashini Mulay and Sushant Singh.
The train-borne climax and its treatment.
Kabeer Kaushik’s superb direction.

9. Socha Na Tha (2005)

Reasons:

For giving us Abhay Deol.
The best film of Imtiyaz Ali (which he keeps on remaking).
Great soundtrack.
Original, energetic and vibrant Ayesha Takia, before she tried to be the next Pam Anderson.

10. Manorama Six Feet Under (2007)

Reasons:

The best homage ever to Chinatown.
For bringing back Noir to Hindi cinema.
The dry humor throughout the film.
Powerhouse performances from Abhay Deol, Gul Panag, Raima Sen and Vinay Pathak.
For stunning cinematography which creates the claustrophobic atmosphere apt for the film.
Lastly, Navdeep Singh’s deft direction.

There are lots of films for the number 11 spot, which I mention as an additional recommendation. Got confused! So am just listing the films which are all tied up for the 11th spot.

1. Yahaan
2. Phir Milenge
3. Chhal
4. Main Madhuri Dixit Banna Chahti Hoon
5. Dhoop

10 most under-rated English films of the decade

2009-12-22T23:00:00.001+05:30

The article on Film.com kind of inspired me to write my own list. The reason being that I really disagreed with the article. To me, Film.com made pathetic choices. That disagreement kind of acted like a catalyst making me write my own list for the most under-rated English movies of this decade.

Now I followed certain parameters (which is followed by Film.com) while selecting the movies.

1. The film can't have surpassed $30 million, either domestically or worldwide.
2. The film can't have been nominated for/won an Oscar.

Which basically means that the movie didn't get acclaim either from revenue or awards.

So here they are, my Top 10 most under-rated English films of the decade, chronologically.

1. High Fidelity (2000)

It is useless to review the movie as most of us have seen it. For those who haven’t, go watch it! Now let’s discuss why it is under-rated.

What a soundtrack! One of the best soundtracks of the decade, if not more. Then there is John Cusack in his prime form. Jack Black with this movie made his arrival into the big league of comedians. Moments that we remember: Top 5 break-ups of all time, Evil-dead bit, the Annie Hall type dissection of a failed romance.

Because of its quirky characters, smart dialogue, and occasional bursts of penetrating humor, High Fidelity stands tall. The movie is just like the DVD back cover says, ‘a bullet’.

2. Waking Life (2001)

Richard Linklater is a genius and this film once again proves it. The film deals with the idea of lucid dreams and the nature of our existence and many other philosophical questions. What struck me about the film was the way in which the superb animation was layered over the film. What this achieves is indeed a sense of a dreamlike viewing experience. The film highlights the idea of how intertwined our dream lives and our waking lives are. Memories that we once thought to be real often turn out to dreams and vice versa.

Waking Life is a unique, cerebral experience.

3. 25th Hour (2002)

'I tattooed 'survive' on my hand the night before I went away to prison. And I did. We do what we have to do to survive.'

The film deals with 24 hours of Monty's (Edward Norton) life before he heads for the maximum security prison for the next seven years being convicted for drug possession. Knowing that he has limited time, Monty tries to spend most of his time with two of his best friends Frank (Barry Pepper) and Jacob (Philip Seymour Hoffman) and with Naturelle (Rosario Dawson), his girlfriend.

It is also one of the first movies to show the New York post 9/11. There is a sequence where we see workers cleaning away the debris from Ground Zero while Frank and Jacob argue about the future of their friendship with Monty. It acts as a terrific metaphor, that Monty's future is as bleak as the ground below. Such moments stay on with you.

The movie has a terrific ensemble cast comprising of Edward Norton, Phil Hoffman, Barry Pepper, Rosario Dawson, Anna Paquin, and Brian Cox. To Spike Lee's credit he extracts brilliant performances from every single person.

25th Hour lingers on your mind long after other movies have evaporated.

4. Punch-Drunk Love (2002)

In my wildest dream, I never imagined to see Adam Sandler in a role like this and performing like this. But then this is a Paul Thomas Anderson movie. The person who made Boogie Nights and Magnolia.

Paul Thomas Anderson's Punch Drunk Love opens with his signature move: juxtaposition. Adam Sandler, handling a nice Nissan coffee mug in the early morning light on a backstreet in LA, watches as a speeding car comes carooming towards him, flips, flips again, and skids offscreen. And then in place of what ought to follow (continuity with the car accident), a cab appears, stops, and deposits an electric organ. It's the instrument with which he will learn the harmonies of love, and it arrives on the heels of trauma.

It is a joy to see the way the camera weaves around beautifully - such fluid photography and visually so elegant. There is not a lazy moment in Punch-Drunk, every frame executed to perfection.

Punch Drunk Love is a film that can easily overwhelm your senses and as the credits roll you may feel totally drained and bewildered - but wanting more.

5. Shattered Glass (2003)

Probably the most under-rated movie of this decade, this gem tells the story of Stephen Glass, one of the top reporters for The New Republic in the 1990's, whose confession about fabricating his stories created a huge splash in the media world. The movie plays like a Greek tragedy showcasing the rise and fall of Glass.

Integrity is one of the cornerstones upon which journalism is based, and, when it is called into question, we begin to doubt everything we read in newspapers and magazines and see on television. Which makes it a very topical subject, since we in India do question the integrity of our media.

Hayden Christensen gives a superb performance and it does come as a surprise since we are used watching him in movies which only highlight his physicality. Peter Sarsgaard, Chloe Sevigny, Hank Azaria and Steve Zahn also adds perfect support.

6. Garden State (2004)

This is my personal favorite in this list. I never expected the 'guy' from Scrubs to deliver a movie which would be so touching, funny and poignant at the same time. This movie is just like a slice of life.

Zach Braff plays Andrew Largeman, a struggling actor in Los Angeles who earns his living being a waiter. The movie is about his homecoming almost after a decade since his mother has passed away. The movie is about how he deals with his grief and how he deals with his father with whom he shares a very cold, distant relationship.

Back home he meets Sam (Natalie Portman) and re-unites with his school best friend Mark (Peter Sarsgaard). The movie is about the coming of age of Andrew while Sam and Mark act as catalysts.

Natalie Portman nails the role. She is just phenomenal as Sam, the dream girl of Andrew. The movie also has a killer soundtrack which enhances the movie to another level.

The movie defines the current generation. Garden State is Indie cinema at its very best.

7. Serenity (2005)

Rarely does this happen that a show which is taken off TV (read canceled) becomes such a cult hit that the producers make a motion picture of it.

Being a huge fan of Firefly, I enjoyed Serenity even more. But that does not mean those who haven't seen Firefly will be disappointed. Serenity stands tall with all its merits as an independent Sci Fi. The characterization and the circumstances reminds me of Blake's 7. For a Sci Fi film, Serenity is pretty verbose. But of the fantastic script and its interlaced humor, it works big time.

Serenity is one of the best Sci Fi of the decade.

8. The Proposition (2005)

If we look carefully, this decade hardly saw the release of good Western movies. I only recall Open Range and 3:10 to Yuma. Even then there is a gap of 5 years between them. Western as a genre was almost non-existent. The Proposition revived it with its release.

Following the rape and murder of a colonial family, outlaw brothers Charlie (Guy Pearce) and Mike Burns (Richard Wilson) are captured by ruthless local lawman, Captain Stanley (Ray Winstone). Rather than imprisoning both fugitives, Stanley presents Charlie with a proposition (though it's really a demand) that Charlie kill his older brother, and gang leader, Arthur (Danny Huston) or else Mikey will meet his demise at the end of a hangman's noose. It is a proposition which will have karmic repercussions for all involved.

It has a stellar cast comprising Guy Pearce, Ray Winstone, Danny Huston, John Hurt and Emily Watson. Evryone performs brilliantly. The film has some of the most gorgeous photography of the Australian outback ever committed to film, showcasing it's unique desolate beauty in it's dust, flies and exquisite sunsets.

The Proposition, to me is the best Western of the decade.

9. Inland Empire (2006)

David Lynch. Another mind bender of a movie. Surreal experience. Laura Dern in the performance of her life. Do I need to say anything more? I don't think so. Experience it!

10. Rescue Dawn (2006)

Werner Herzog is one crazy genius! Rescue Dawn proves that.

After getting shot down in Laos, Dieter Dengler (Christian Bale) is captured, tortured, and eventually transported to a remote POW camp where he is united with fellow American pilots with the same problem. The film tells the story of how Dieter along with Duane (Steve Zahn) escapes from the camp. Herzog makes no attempt to pump this story up into a thrilling adventure. There is nothing thrilling about dysentery, starvation, insect bites and despair. Rescue Dawn isn't about heroism. It is about something deeper, more primitive: survival instinct.

This movie has the career best performances of Christian Bale and Steve Zahn. Rescue Dawn is one of the finest POW movies ever made in the history of cinema.

Although I have finished naming the 10 most under-rated English movies of decade, I cannot help but add one more film as recommendation.

11. The Fall (2008)

A lot of things are being told about Avatar. That James Cameron has created a new world which is breathtaking. It is rightly said so. Avatar is indeed breathtaking. But is it real? No. It is a virtual world.

How about looking at what we have and try to see if that is equally breathtaking or not? The Fall is the answer for that. This is the most gorgeous looking film in the history of cinema and that too devoid of a single frame of special effects. The Fall is what we call 'passion' - passion for cinema. Tarsem Singh shot the movie all over the world. The movie is only worth a look just for its cinematography. The colors, the framing, costumes, lighting, the backdrops, all are gorgeous; seems like a dream.

The story, screenplay could have been better. That is the reason I am keeping it at number 11 as a special mention.

Broken Wings

2009-12-11T12:25:00.000+05:30

My first short film...

Broken Wings from Aniruddha Chatterjee on Vimeo.

15th Kolkata Film Festival 2009 – Day 5

2009-11-22T17:27:00.001+05:30

On Sunday, they had the worst films scheduled. It was pretty hard to decide which ones to watch as most films were similar, all equally unimpressive.

Katalin Varga was playing at noon. Since it had won a couple of awards at MAMI recently, thought of giving it a try.

All the movies I watched had one common theme. They all dealt with abuse on women be it rape, murder or both. Of course the treatment were different as chalk and cheese, which differentiated the movies from being good or crap.

Katalin Varga
Dir: Peter Strickland
Romania/ 82 min

I honestly didn’t expect a clichéd storyline like this to be treated so differently. The movie tells the story of Katalin (Hilda Peter), who was raped by Antal (Tibor Palffy), looking for vengeance.

What also helps the movie to seem so different is the setting. It is a completely different world. So secluded. Where people still travel using horse drawn carts. Yet folks use mobile phones. Also using forests as backgrounds rather than landscapes give the movie a certain eeriness that goes perfectly with the theme of the movie.

The cinematography and the shot composition is something else. Almost the entire movie is shot in low, diffused light as most of the time it is either early morning or night. It looks so surreal. Hilda Peter gives a very nuanced performance.

I’m Tired of Killing Your Lovers
Dir: Nikos Panayotopoulos
Greece/ 105 min

This is first movie I watched of Nikos Panayotopoulos. It will probably be the last. What a pathetic waste of time I had! The movie made no sense whatsoever.

The movie tells the story of Theofilos (Nicos Arvanitis), who is a book publisher and his obsession towards Sia (Theofania Papathoma), a performer. Then there is Theofilos’ rich aunt who is suddenly killed by her young lover. Theofilos steals some jewelry from his dead aunt’s place. Later he gets framed for the murder and lots of chaos happens.

The movie is exactly as chaotic as the storyline seems. Except for Theofania Papathoma who looks hot, there is nothing redeemable in the movie.

Wastage!

Backyard
Dir: Carlos Carrera
Mexico/ 120 min

Now Carlos Carrera is one director I admire a lot. Especially after I watched The Crime of Padre Amaro. So I really wanted to watch Backyard. Thankfully, it didn’t disappoint.

Backyard tells the story of rape and murder of women in the rural areas of Mexico near the US border. It also tells about the corruption in the Mexican administration.

Borderland (2006), a movie starring Jennifer Lopez and Antonio Banderas had a similar storyline. But since it was a Hollywood film, the execution was very superficial rather than showing the actual problem.

Thankfully Backyard goes deep into the core issue. The rural Mexico is so drastically different to look at. Sometimes the entire frame seems like a desert storm. It makes one feel claustrophobic to stay in such places.

The ending is very pessimistic but that is the actual reality. It is an important film that tells a powerful story which needs to be lauded.

15th Kolkata Film Festival 2009 – Day 4

2009-11-22T17:18:00.000+05:30

It just gets better and better. All the 3 movies that I saw today were impressive to say the least. This year German movies are taking all the honors. I have seen 3 German movies and those 3 movies impressed me the most till now.

Now Andrzej Wajda is coming to Kolkata tomorrow from what I have heard. If it’s true, tomorrow is going to be special.

Made in Hungaria
Dir: Gergely Fonyo
Hungary/ 109 min

Finally a musical! Such a refreshing change from the other movies till now.

The film is about a small town in Hungary set in the early 1960s. Miki (Tamás Szabó Kimmel) along with his family returns from US and tries to make his own band and play music influenced by American artists. Being a communist country, Miki along with his band-mates faces objection from the authorities for playing American music.

First of all, the soundtrack (especially the songs) is phenomenal. That itself elevates the movie a few notches than average. There isn’t much to write about the story, as it is fairly predictable. But the movie is very enjoyable and pretty humorous. Since it is a commercial, mainstream film, several cinematic liberties are taken and in certain sequences the songs seem forced and doesn’t quite gel. Still even with those flaws, it is a good watch.

Cherry Blossoms – Hanami
Dir: Doris Dorrie
Germany/ 127 min

Sometimes one is dumbfounded after watching a movie. That is exactly what happened to me after I watch the movie.

The movie is about an elderly couple Rudi (Elmar Wepper) and Trudi (Hannelore Elsner) and what happens when suddenly Trudi dies. Rudi visits his son in Japan, as it was Trudi’s unfulfilled dream to visit Japan, watch Mt. Fuji, cherry blossoms and Butoh, a dance form of Japan. Rudi befriends Yu (Aya Irizuki), a Butoh dancer, while in Japan. The movie then becomes about their journey.

The storyline itself is the highlight of the film. Very few films deal with love between an elderly couple. But the trump card is the relationship between Rudi and Yu. The bonding they share becomes special.

I didn’t find a single flaw in the movie. Every scene felt like poetry. The cinematography and editing are just phenomenal. Aya Irizuki and Elmar Wepper are just outstanding. What performances!

The climax is one of the most fascinating climaxes I have seen in my lifetime. It provides one of the most exquisite unions of souls in the history of cinema.

Very highly recommended.

Moscow, Belgium
Dir: Christophe Van Rompaey
Belgium/ 102 min

Now this movie had the best reviews among the movies being played in the festival. So I expected a lot from it. Maybe that is why I was a tad disappointed.

The movie is about Matty (Barbara Sarafian), a mother of three, who is going through her separation with her husband and how she meets a truck driver Johnny (Jurgen Delnaet). Matty and Johnny starts to like each other but their relationship is opposed by her teenage daughter Vera (Anemone Valcke). Matty thus faces a dilemma between choosing Johnny and her husband.

The storyline is predictable, but what really makes the movie standout is the treatment. It seems very real. Of course the performances help. Barbara Sarafian is really good as the worn out, confused Matty. But to me, Anemone Valcke nailed it as Vera, the teenage daughter. There is not a single wrong expression. The movie is pretty funny too which makes it enjoyable.

Moscow, Belgium is a good film to watch mainly because of the treatment. However, its better if the expectations are low.

15th Kolkata Film Festival 2009 – Day 3

2009-11-22T17:06:00.000+05:30

Day 2 was much better than Day 1. So I hoped it continues with Day 3 too. It did. I did a couple of changes to the schedule and it worked again.

Zift
Dir: Javor Gardev
Bulgaria/ 92 min

A neo-noir with a narrative style like Tarantino and Ritchie is what I was told about Zift. I didn’t think twice.

It tells the story of Moth (Zahary Baharov) who is out on parole after being imprisoned for 15 years for a heist. It is his journey to find his wife. There is also another track involving Moth’s old partner trying to find him to settle old score.

The film was nothing new. Technically however it was superb. Cinematography, editing were top notch and so was the background score. However, a lot of scenes were just unnecessary and stood like a sore thumb. Few of the comedy tracks seemed forced. Also too much philosophy during voice-over spoiled the flow. It became a tad tedious.

Sweet Rush
Dir: Andrzej Wajda
Poland/ 85 min

This was the first time I watched any movie of the Polish auteur. He delivered and how!

Sweet Rush is about an elderly woman, Marta (Krystyna Janda) who is married to a doctor. It is about how she wants to be young all over again after she meets a guy (Pawel Szajda) who’s much younger. There is also a parallel track where Krystyna Janda plays herself and tells about her life. The movie is about how both the reel and real life becomes one.

After watching this movie, I am a fan of Wajda. I just loved every single frame of it. The setting, the locations, the cinematography, the performances, everything is perfect. There is a monologue about 10 minutes long where Krystyna Janda plays herself and talks. It is just out of this world. The way that scene is lit up, shot and the way Krystyna Janda performed gave me goose bumps.

Phenomenal!

Landscape No. 2
Dir: Vinko Modernorfer
Slovenia/ 90 min

This one surprised me completely. Didn’t expect the movie to be this good.

Landscape No. 2 tells the story of two burglars, Sergej (Marko Mandic) and Polde (Janez Hocevar) who steal a painting from a retired general’s house. Along with the painting, Serjej by mistake steals an important document of World War 2 which if leaked might create huge uproar in the country. The movie is about the consequences the burglars face when the general hires someone to get the document back.

Although a few cinematic liberties are taken, still Landscape No. 2 works big time. The movie is highly entertaining, crisply cut, has great cinematography and a super background score.

Hilde
Dir: Kai Wessel
Germany/ 136 min

Day 3 ended with a bang. What a movie it was! And what a performance! Speechless.

Hilde is a biopic on Hildegard Knef, one of Germany’s biggest post World War 2 stars.

What a life this lady had. From being an actress in West Germany, to being a soldier during World War 2, going to Hollywood to be a star and being able to do nothing, being super successful in Germany after coming back and then leaving it all to do what she loved most, singing. Just not singing, but to be one of the most popular singers ever.

All of the above would not have been possible had Heike Makatsch not played Hilde. She nails it. The movie covers 30 years span and what a performance she gives. It deserves standing ovation.

Everything in the movie is pitch perfect. The sets, cinematography, editing – which is just awesome. One of the best biopic I have seen in a long time.

15th Kolkata Film Festival 2009 - Day 2

2009-11-22T16:46:00.000+05:30

After a slightly disappointing first day, I went back and rescheduled couple of films from Day 2. It did wonders. But the highlight of Day 2 was to meet Helena Ignez, the actress of The Woman of Everyone and daughter of director Rogerio Sganzerla, both of whom had come to present the film.

The Woman of Everyone
Dir: Rogerio Sganzerla
Brazil/ 93 min

The movie should have been renamed ‘Making out in VIBGYOR’. The print was horrendous. The movie had different color tones on different scenes throughout. The first couple of minutes was Red and then suddenly changed to Green and then changed to Violet and like that.

The movie had nothing to say. It only showed the skin of Helena Ignez. The film is about Angela (Helena Ignez) and her adventures with different men. All she did throughout the movie was scream in the world’s screechiest voice and make out with atleast 20 guys throughout the movie.

Even as soft-core porn, it does not stand a chance. It is that bad.

A Woman’s Way
Dir: Panos H. Koutras
Greece/ 111 min

After watching one of the worst movies of my life, I was really scared to watch this movie. Love story between a convict and a transsexual is a very unusual storyline and if not handled with immense sensitivity and maturity would fall flat on its face. Thankfully the movie had both and in plenty.

The movie tells the story of Yiorgos (Yannis Kokiasmenos), a convict who gets released after 15 years of imprisonment and his relationship with a transsexual, Strella (Mina Orfanou). There is also a parallel story of Yiorgos trying to find his son.

The movie is very complex and in films like these, the climax is the most important aspect and most films falter there. However, with utmost sensitivity shown by the director and with help from the cinematographer, the film stands tall.

But, the best part of the movie is Mina Orfanou’s performance as Strella. It is just unbelievable. It is one of the best performances by a female actor in recent times.

A Year Ago in Winter
Dir: Caroline Link
Germany/ 128 min

Having missed this movie yesterday due to scheduling conflict, I made sure I get to watch this. I have heard and read so much about the movie, and everything positive. So went to watch the movie with huge expectations. It delivered and how.

The film tells the story of a family and how they heal themselves after the loss of their son. The parents want to get their son’s portrait done for the 1st death anniversary while the daughter Lilli (Karoline Herfurth) is dead against it. It also tells the story of the bonding that grows between the painter and her.

Every single scene felt like poetry. Not a single scene seemed unnecessary. The direction is so assured. The equations between different characters within the family are beautifully shown. Cinematography is phenomenal and so is the editing. Karoline Herfurth as Lilli gives a superlative performance.

All in all the best film of the festival so far and probably will be.

Aching Hearts
Dir: Nils Malmros
Denmark/ 117 mins

After coming out of Caroline Link’s film, I thought of going home as I was sure to be under-whelmed by the next one. I am glad I watched it.

The film tells the story of a group of high school kids and their experiences with love and sexuality. It spans three years and can also be interpreted as a coming of age drama.

Although the movie is fairly slow to begin with, it still keeps the viewers engrossed. Since the movie is from the protagonist’s point of view, a lot of voice-overs are used. It felt very similar to ‘The Wonder Years’. The cinematography is really nice with some great wide shots. The performances are uniformly good. Although a number of movies in the recent past dealt with subjects like that, still the theme is such that one slowly cares for the movie. We all love to watch the charm of the school days and the confusion created due to love, especially if it’s well made.

15th Kolkata Film Festival 2009 - Day 1

2009-11-22T16:24:00.000+05:30

With so many films to choose from I was really confused. I also had to make sure I choose movies by looking that their running time. Finally, after a few hours I was done with my schedule for Kolkata Film Festival. I will be watching 26 movies 7 days. Phew! Some crazy week this is going to be.

I started with Fellini as I thought most people would have seen his work so the theater would be less populated. And I was correct indeed.

Variety Lights
Dir: Federico Fellini
Italy/ 93 min

I really wanted to watch the movie, as it is Fellini’s debut film as a director. I was surprised to see that it is unlike most of Fellini’s work. It has a very straightforward narrative and it is completely void of any symbolism. The narrative is similar to `La Strada’ and `Nights of Cabiria.’

The film tells the story of a troupe of performers and what happens when a beautiful, young woman with dreams of perusing her career in showbiz joins the troupe. How the equations of relationship change and how much the troupe and the people in it are affected by it. The three main leads, Peppino De Filippo (as Checco), Carla Del Poggio (as Liliana) and Fellini’s wife Giulietta Masina (as Melina Amour) give superlative performances. The film is highly enjoyable with lots of humor thrown in. The ‘behind the scenes’ of the performing troupe is shown with lots of detailing.

Variety Lights is definitely not among Fellini’s best works, but still a very enjoyable movie with good performances.

Lost Song
Dir: Rodrique Jean
Canada/ 102 min

After beginning with Fellini’s movie, I was worried if the next movie would not meet the already set expectations. Just like I thought, the second movie was a damp squib.

Rodrigue Jean’s Lost Song tells the story of a couple, Pierre (Patrick Goyette) and Elisabeth (Suzie LeBlanc), and their struggle with post-partum depression. While the subject is interesting, the execution is absolutely not. So much so that I was wondering what was the necessity of the first 30 minutes. It seemed like 3 or 4 sequences over and over again. It felt like a montage of similar sequences without making any sense. It was frustratingly slow.

The characterization of Elizabeth, the mother, is very uneven. So sequences which should have resulted in sympathy towards the character, results in cheap shocks for the confused audience. The only plus point of the movie is the superb performance of Suzie Le Blanc as Elizabeth, the mother suffering from post-partum depression.

But that ultimately does not save the movie from becoming frustratingly slow and confusing garbage.

The Desert Within
Dir: Rodrigo Pla
Mexico/ 112 min

This one completely took me by surprise. I had plans to watch some other movie. But due to the excess crowd I went to watch Rodrigo Pla’s The Desert Within. The best decision of the day I took!

The backdrop of the film is 1920s when Mexico government banned Catholicism and persecuted its followers. The film tells the story of Elias (Mario Zaragoza) and how he puts his family into trouble by trying to have his unborn child Baptized. To redeem himself and his family of his sins, Elias starts building a church. What happens to the family after the church is built forms the crux of the film.

This movie is a powerful tale about the obsessive pursuit of redemption and the toll it takes on the family. The film is divided into four chapters: Sin, Penance, Sign and Pardon. By the time the movie ends, Elias has become a tragic figure of Shakespearean proportions.

The best part of the movie is the usage of animation along with live action and how perfectly both blends. The cinematography is breathtaking. The acting is uniformly good but Mario Zaragoza takes the cake with a superb performance.

For me, The Desert Within was the best movie of the day.

Lake Tahoe
Dir: Fernando Eimbcke
Mexico/ 85 min

Fernando Eimbcke’s Lake Tahoe is a lovely, little indie about coming of age. The film tells the story of Juan (Diego Cataño), who crashed his car to a post and his (mis) adventures in trying to find a mechanic to repair his car. There is also a parallel story about dealing with the loss of his father.

Fernando Eimbcke seems to be inspired by Jim Jarmusch that is evident in the way Lake Tahoe is shot. The luminous long shots, the wide-angle cinematography and cut into segments with blackouts – all reminiscent of Jim Jarmusch’s early works. The deadpan look on Juan’s face, the lack of characters in the movie and on the streets, all add on to show the emptiness in Juan’s life following his father’s death.

The film is fairly enjoyable with dry humor throughout. The only issue with the movie is the editing pattern. The blackouts used in the movie are so long and repetitive and after a point it becomes tedious and starts affecting the charm of the movie.

Yet with all its flaws, Lake Tahoe is a rewarding, little indie that deserves a watch.

Wake Up Sid - Talking Points

2009-10-08T17:31:00.000+05:30

This is NOT a review. These are some points which I felt are necessary to discuss.

The term ‘Coming of age’ is, quintessentially, Hindi cinema. The hero, not always necessarily a very young man, is almost always jobless and does not have much maturity in understanding his responsibilities. Yet, the heroine still falls for him. And by the time the movie ends, we get to see the transformation of this hero into a more mature, understanding-his-responsibilities who gets-the-girl man! If this is not ‘coming of age’, then what is? It’s just that our filmmakers have been more forthcoming and liberal in using the tag ‘coming of age’ in the last few years.

The basic premise of Wake Up Sid is not exactly ground-breaking. Sid, a spoilt but privileged college student, with no sense of purpose or responsibilities, wakes up to life after interacting with Aisha. The only ‘hatke’ thing here is that Aisha, the heroine, is older and supposedly more mature than him.

Right from the initial scene, when we see Sid, the film travels to known territory. Sid is least interested in his studies and thinks that life is a big party. His rich parents don’t seem to be too bothered and happily pay his credit card bills. Firstly, why is it that, urban, rich kids are always shown to be so confused with life? Also, why is it that, neither of Sid’s parents say anything to him when they are aware that he his least bit interested in his studies? Isn’t education of any importance to them? Especially so, when we hear Sid’s mother complaining that Sid was a good student in school. Yet, she chooses to be a doting mother who has nothing to say. Also why do most fathers try and bribe their kids with a Porsche (or a Mercedes or BMW) to join their business when they have just finished their degree (B.Com in the case of this movie)?

These things are highly questionable.

Now let’s focus on Aisha. She has come to Mumbai all the way from Kolkata to start her life. She says, she has no friends, or family here. Yet, and just after a couple of days in Mumbai, she manages to get an apartment of her own. The transformation of that apartment into a designer suite is hard to take seriously. We see Aisha along with Sid and his friends painting the apartment on their own because Aisha cannot afford much money. Yet, the drapes used in the apartment are of designer quality. She uses a Mac but cannot afford a washing machine. Details, anyone? These things just don’t fit in. I wonder if everyone has to look his or her best and stay in the best possible places no matter what their backgrounds are just because it is a Karan Johar movie!!

After Sid moves out of the house and stays with Aisha, not even once do we get to see a scene where his parents call him up and persuade him to come back home. Is that normal? Much later, we do see his mother coming to the apartment, and offering Aisha money instead of actually staying back till Sid comes and persuading him to return back to their house. Nor do we see a single scene where Sid’s parents are concerned about Sid abandoning them and the house. Aren’t they bothered at all?

One might say that some things are obvious and if explained, will be akin to spoon-feeding. I agree, too. But if that is the case, then why write a screenplay with a clichéd story. Isn’t a dad’s trying to bribe his son with a car clichéd? Isn’t showing a doting mother saying nothing to her spoilt son clichéd?

So far my article might seem to be a rant. Yes, it is. It is a sin to have such an ordinary first half that is so full of clichés for a movie whose second half is just brilliant! The treatment of the second half where we see two parallel coming-of-age stories is just exceptional. That completely elevates this movie and makes the movie a decent enough watch.

The movie benefits immensely from the technical department. The cinematography by Anil Mehta makes Bombay look beautiful. The background score elevates the movie. Amit Trivedi rocks with 'Iktara'.

But what makes the movie are the performances. Ranbir Kapoor just nails it. He IS Sid. It is tough to share screen space with the most talented actress of our times - Konkona Sen Sharma. But Ranbir actually does exceptionally well. Konkona is always good. She can never be even average. But the surprise package of the movie is Shikha Talsania who plays Sid's friend Laxmi. She is just so natural.

Anupam Kher and Supriya Pathak are wasted as their role is far too cliched. But what is Rahul 'the stud who never gets the girl' Khanna doing here? It is the same role he did in Love Aaj Kal.

The direction of Ayan Mukherji is so assured. It is a pity that his script doesn’t quite compliment his directorial skills. Had he worked on the script a bit more, we could have had one of the best “coming of age” movies of our times.

I guess he needs to ‘wake up’ now! Or is it Karan Johan who needs to wake up?

Corporate Burnout

2009-09-21T01:09:00.000+05:30

There is a scene in ‘Requiem for a Dream’ where director Darren Aronofsky uses a montage where multiple things are happening concurrently with different characters in the movie. The way that montage has been edited gives us a feeling of a machine working.

After having worked as a Database Administrator for two years, I often find myself identifying to that scene. My education and work happened in a very similar way depicted in that montage. I finished my Bachelor of Engineering, worked for a year, followed that with pursuing a Masters in Engineering and worked again for another year. Although it was solely my decision to study Engineering and work, and while I did fairly well in both, there was a sense of frustration building up in me all along. There came in a point when work just did not seem creative or interesting enough!

I have been fascinated about cinema since my childhood. As I grew up, I also started understanding and appreciating the different technical aspects of it rather than the mere gloss and glory. Editing to me is the most creative technical aspect of film-making. Depending on how you edit a film, the entire perception towards it can change.

When I was working in Bangalore and every time I went home, I used to assist a family friend who is a documentary film-maker. I tried to learn about shot selection, camera angles, what to use as a subject, how to edit and the like. I however learnt much more while having discussions with him about the movie. When I said this camera angle suits better, he would defend himself and that two-way dialogue used to be fascinating. His explanation about why he wanted to compose a particular shot as per his vision and not mine, educated me a lot more than just handling the camera would have perhaps.

Later when I was working in Dallas, I joined an independent film club where they would watch Indie films every weekend and discuss them. Hearing so many points of view of various people from different walks of life, all gathered together just for their love of cinema, triggered my longing to learn editing even further.

So here I am a corporate burnout, currently without a job, waiting to join a film institute to learn editing, not sure what the future holds, with nothing but pride and satisfaction that atleast I am going to do what I always wanted.

Wanted | The Return of Machismo

2009-09-21T00:53:00.000+05:30

When we search the word ‘Hero’ in the dictionary, it says ‘a man of distinguished courage or ability, admired for his brave deeds and noble qualities’. After watching Wanted one gets the same feeling. Wanted is all about Hero-ism. It brings back the days when Hindi cinema was about macho-ism. Where the hero would be so larger than life that nothing will happen to him and he will get away with everything he wants to do. When Hindi cinema is going through a change, the change being more real life stories attempted and more so called ‘multiplex movies’ are being made, it feels nice to see a true unpretentious film about being larger than life.

Salman plays Radhe, a hitman who works for anyone who quotes the highest. Then there are a few ‘Bhais’ who are trying to rule over Mumbai. Among the ‘Bhais’, the main competition is among Golden gang headed by Gani Bhai (Prakash Raj) and Data Pawle gang. Obviously there is a corrupt cop, Inspector Talpade (played by Mahesh Manjrekar) and an honest Police Commissioner, Ashraf Khan (Govind Namdeo). How can I forget the seedhi-saadhi girl (Ayesha Takia Azmi)? Well Salman works for Golden gang and starts cleaning the members of the other gangs. Meanwhile Govind Namdeo promises to have a clean Mumbai and Mahesh Manjrekar’s lustful eyes fall on Ayesha Takia. Ayesha however seems to have fallen in love with Salman even after watching him on a killing spree. If only more girls were there like her! Anyway, there is not much novelty in the storyline and the movie doesn’t claim that.

But the film is fairly entertaining. The entire movie revolves around Salman. It is about the aura of macho-ism he creates. After a long time he delivers. This movie does not require him to display his histrionics. It needs him to create an environment where everything is larger than life. Thanks to the editing and the action set pieces, he manages that. When Salman takes on more than 10 people alone, one doesn’t laugh but feels confident that this guy can beat the crap out of those 10 people. This dynamism succeeds in making the film entertaining.

Ayesha Takia Azmi however disappoints big time. Her character is just not believable. I mean it is just un-fathomable that an educated, urban girl will like a person like Salman even after watching him on rampage. Her scenes with Salman just doesn’t work. The scenes inside the lift and on the railway station are so badly written that one cringes. One person who really entertains with his performance is Prakash Raj. His character is very over the top. There was every chance to make a caricature of out it. To his credit he balances the comic element and the negativity pretty well. Mahesh Manjrekar, Govind Namdeo, Vinod Khanna and Inder Kumar are all decent in their roles.

The film however suffers from a pathetic comedy track. It is crude which probably goes well with the story and treatment. What does not work is the fact that most of the comic scenes are just not funny and seems completely out of context.

The music also is of mixed variety. ‘Jalwa’ is the only song that is good. The rest of the songs are bad and also the placement is very poor. They are just not needed. It would have helped the film immensely had a couple of songs been edited out.

Technically however the movie pretty good. Cinematography by Nirav Shah and S Sriram is good. The background score by Salim-Suleiman although a tad loud fits well with the movie. The two technical aspects which however completely elevate the movie are editing and action. The editing, especially during the action sequences is really good. The action set pieces created by Vijayan Master are simply phenomenal. We are used to stylized action for a long time now. This is just raw violence and it looks spectacular on screen. One also needs to applaud Salman for executing them with gusto. The climax action sequence (although copied from the French movie Banlieue 13) is just outstanding.

Prabhu Deva should be given credit for utilizing Salman Khan properly. However he should have edited the comic track and a couple of songs from the movie which would have made the film crisper and better.

At a time when we are appreciating dumb, mindless, popcorn flicks like Transformers 2 and G.I.Joe, we probably should give Wanted a fair try. It is unpretentious fun at its best. Is it a great film? No. Is it an entertaining film? Yes. If you want to watch a time-pass, entertaining film, Wanted is just for you. If you want a movie where you need your gray matter to work, sit at home and enjoy something else. Why bother going to the theater and whine later.

Mohandas – A Man Lost in his Own Nation

2009-09-05T08:52:00.000+05:30

“Fake lives are real and the real does not even exist.”

I heard about the movie Mohandas a few months back. I searched on Youtube and after playing with the keywords for a while, finally found the trailer. I was interested as I loved Mazhar Kamran’s work in Satya. After finding the trailer interesting, I kept waiting to hear more about the movie from someone on PFC. Sadly, no one recommended. Nor did anyone talk about the movie. Last week I came to know the movie is releasing on 4^th September. I was worried whether the movie will release in Bangalore or not. Thankfully it did. It is running 2 shows in entire Bangalore. Talk about fate of Hindi indie films in India!

The film tells the story of Mohandas, a brilliant student despite economic backwardness and how his life turns topsy-turvy when he finds out someone impersonified him and is working in the coal mines instead of him. His story is then sent to a news channel based in Delhi and how a journalist tries to uncover the truth.

Mohandas revives the cinema of the late 70s and early 80s when movies talked about social inequities and had something to say. It looks really different than the rest of the Hindi movies just because of the landscape. The barren lands, the coal mines, the dust, the poverty all adds up to create an atmosphere of frustration just like the protagonist is experiencing.

There is a scene in the movie when Mohandas says, “Woh kagaz kahan se laoon, jo yeh baat bataae, ki main hi main hoon." And then you see the despair in his eyes and the camera shifts to the all the other characters present there and no one has an answer. That makes the movie scary and very topical. Identity theft is a very serious issue in the internet age and several instances have been found. The movie which talks about it is located in a village in Madhya Pradesh which probably does not have electricity.

The beauty of the film lies in its story. Here there is a movie which has a story to tell. You get deeply engrossed into the movie as it progresses. It is like slow burn. As the movie progresses, one feels the frustration, anger, despair of the protagonist. The rustic color palette that the movie uses due to the real locations is so different than the regular Hindi movies we see, that it becomes a character of its own.

The characterization in the movie is also very realistic. We see a lot of people with gray shades for a change. There is a local journalist who is interested in Mohandas’ case as it might help him get a break into national television. Although the local people talks about Mohandas’ case, no one is interested to really help him out.

Towards the end of the film, after the verdict is given, the cast breaks into song and dance mode. It kind of comes out of place in context of the movie and I was wondering why on earth the director added this. Thankfully the movie does not end there and the reality prevails. The movie ends brilliantly. It feels like a tight slap on the face. Although it might feel pessimistic, it is actually closer to reality.

Coming to technicalities, the cinematography is really good. But we expect that from Mazhar Kamran. There were two instances where it went out of focus, but I think it was the flaw of the projection. The background score (and sometimes the lack of it) adds to the mood of the movie. Since real locations have been used, it looks very believable. However, one scene at the beginning of the movie which shows Sonali Kulkarni’s apartment is very unrealistic. How come she, a journalist live in such a posh apartment? Even if she does, the color choices of the interior decor are cringe worthy. There are instances in the first half where the pace slackens and probably needs a little bit of editing. The flaskback of Mohandas’ childhood is very clichéd. Similar scenes of poor child shining in school have been shown umpteenth times.

Coming to performances, Mohandas has an ensemble cast. Nakul Vaid underplays the role beautifully. His eyes do show the pain. Sonali Kulkarni is good. Aditya Shrivastav as always is brilliant. Uttam Halder, someone I never saw before is really good as the local journalist. Govind Namdeo, Sushant Singh and Akhilendra Mishra are competent. Sharbani Mukherjee falters to some extent. I thought she didn’t look the part. Also the way she speaks is unconvincing.

Mohandas is a rare Hindi movie which dares to speak something different. It is an independent movie in the true sense. It makes a very strong socio-political statement of the current times.

It is flawed. But then flawed brilliance is still brilliant, right?

Post Script:

One noted film critic (or not) while reviewing Mohandas has said, “…not all stories have the potential to be adapted for the big screen. Mohandas suffers due to this reason.”

There were 7 people in the theater other than me. Except for one guy, I don’t think anyone was even remotely interested in watching the movie. I could overhear popcorn discussions frequently.

While coming out there was huge rush as Fox also finished next door. The discussions were detailed analysis of the northern and southern hemisphere of Udita Goswami and what cars Arjun Rampal drove. Within moments of coming out of the theater, it felt like another India.

Wake Up!

2009-08-19T17:33:00.000+05:30

Shattered Dreams

Secluded for ages
Don't know what to do
Life's been an abusive pain

Traveled the dark alleys of drugs
Thought they will provide sunshine
Instead took me to another cosmos
So brutal; Left me battered

Self mutilation was the only way out
Looked around for inspiration
Found it; Two slices on the wrist
A surging pain of relief

Quarter of a life flashed
Thought will see only nightmares
Wait! The images I recall are of joy
Is this what life has been?

Confused. Why now?
Do I want a second chance?
But it's too late
All I see is darkness ahead

Eyes open. I see blood all around
I am cowardice personified
Never tried hard for anything in life
Yet complained, "Amores Perros"

Wake Up!
It's never too late
Wake Up!
Redemption tastes good, always

Antaheen – Longing For Love

2009-08-05T04:31:00.001+05:30

http://passionforcinema.com/antaheen-%E2%80%93-the-longs-for-love/

‘Antaheen’ is a collage of love stories, without saying the most abused phrase in Hindi (or Indian) cinema ‘I love you’ even once. Perhaps that is why I identified with it so much. The love shown here seems real, one that can happen in our lives and change them forever. Love comes in many different ways at various points of the lives of the characters in ‘Antaheen’. Love is watching Kolkata in the rains, a de-familiarized landscape. Love is Persian poet Rumi’s love poem written on the glass divider and rain drops falling on it. Love is talking about a kite trapped in an antenna. Love is also patiently waiting for the phone to ring so that one can hear the voice of the unknown caller. Love is also a phone call to one’s separated wife and requesting her if he can come over and stay with her for a few days just to feel that emotional attachment and the sense of belonging. Love is also a nod from a busy and indifferent businessman to his servant to give his wife medicine, when she suffers from migraine.

Moments like these make ‘Antaheen’. It is in all these fragments that we understand the totality of love in this film.

I enjoy discussing the craft of the movie more than the story line or the entertainment quotient. ‘Antaheen’ gives ample opportunity to do that. Let’s start with cinematography. Abhik Mukhopadhyay, I believe, is currently the best cinematographer in India. His work in ‘Bhalo Theko’ is a testament to that statement. I think he outperforms himself in ‘Antaheen’. Kolkata has never looked so up-market, chic and romantic. The sky scrapers, view of the city from the high rises, roads and traffic jam amidst rain, clouds, indoors all add up to give Kolkata a new look for viewers. The songs are wonderfully shot and for once the lyrics and the shots merge perfectly.

The editing compliments the cinematography perfectly. There are frames where the camera lingers on for couple of seconds more before its transition to the next scene which makes them extra special. The pace is slow. But that is ideal for a movie like this. It is almost a contrast to the fast paced urban life in the movie. I think the slow pacing is deliberate to bring out the pathos of loneliness in the middle of urbanity.

The soundtrack of ‘Antaheen’ is the best Bengali soundtrack I have heard this entire decade (or more). The songs with their picturization are special, especially ‘Jao Pakhi’. Also, the songs merge into the narrative very smoothly.

Aniruddha Roychowdhury’s direction deserves merit. He previously made ‘Anuranan’ (Resonance), a film that dealt with urban relationships. Although I liked that film, somewhere down the line I felt it was a little hurried, especially at the end. In ‘Antaheen’ he gets it right. It ends hitting the perfect note. There are many sub-plots in the movie and he handles most of them brilliantly. ‘Antaheen’ is very emotional movie and to sustain the emotional quotient till the very end is commendable. He also extracts great performances from the cast especially the newcomers.

Talking about performances, Antaheen has a stellar star cast with performers like Aparna Sen, Sharmila Tagore and Rahul Bose. There are also two debutants, Radhika Apte and Kalyan Roy. Let’s talk about the debutants first. Both Radhika Apte and Kalyan Roy are phenomenal. They are so good that one forgets about Aparna Sen and Rahul Bose although they have similar screen time as the debutants. Radhika Apte’s eyes speak a thousand words. Her performance is one of the most spontaneous performances in recent times. Kalyan Roy as the laidback, separated husband who loves books, foreign wines and Sensex is equally brilliant. It is the star performers who falter to an extent. Rahul Bose is his usual self. Also, his one dimensional character didn’t help. Aparna Sen on the other hand has an interesting role. I don’t think she played a corporate lady before. It's a new look for her too. Yet, she looks a tad tired with her performance. Sharmila Tagore is wasted in a small role. Except one scene where she talks about her story, all she does is bring Jasmine tea.

The biggest flaw of the movie is the endorsements which keep coming in almost every frame of the movie like a pop-up. It becomes an irritant and makes some scenes a laughing stock. Also certain scenes went a little overboard and became melodramatic. Rahul Bose quoting Jim Morrison in a hostage situation is hard to digest.

The movie becomes the journey of all the characters on a self discovery trip and long for love. Some end alone, some together. But the longing remains.

Great Soundtracks……Terrible Movies

2009-03-02T22:00:00.000+05:30

The most common allegation about the Hindi film industry that people make is that its worst phase was from mid 1980s till the mid 1990s. Movies released during the late 1980s are in most people’s “Torture Series”. However, there are a lot of movies which had really exceptional music even though the movies were terrible.

Being born in 1981, the late 80s are almost a blurred memory. The only thing I remember is we used have a monthly movie time when dad used to hire a VCR and we were let to watch movies. That was the good part. The bad part was that out of 10 movies shown, 8 were Bengali movies of Uttam Kumar and Suchitra Sen. Not that they weren’t great. They were and still are. But, we had seen them so many times that we got bored of them. Also, I don’t think anyone below 10 would really be interested watch those movies. What we (we being my cousin brother and I) waited eagerly was when were shown the non-Bengali stuff. It used to be mainly Chaplin/Laurel-Hardy/Tom and Jerry or the live action comic book movies like Superman/Batman etc… Once in while we were let to watch Hindi movies.

Even then I was too young to understand most Hindi movies. But, what I used to like about them is their soundtrack. Later in my late teens, I revisited most movies by getting their VHS tapes or VCDs. And most movies were indeed shocking.

Jeeva – 1986 – Raj Sippy – RD Burman – Sanjay Dutt/Mandakini

My most favorite song from the 1980s is ‘Roz Roz Aankhon Tale’.

I don’t remember anything about the movie from childhood other than loving the song. Later when I watched it again I almost felt like throwing up when that song played. Why? No offense but when I saw Mandakini lip syncing it, it was way too much for me to digest. Add to that the horrible movie. Did all the movies made that time had to be ‘Gaon ka chora’ returning as a dacait to take revenge? Well, what more can we expect from the famous Raj Sippy – creator of such wonderful movies as Loha (1987), Shehzaade (1989), Saugandh (1991), Mr. Bond (1992), Ikke Pe Ikka (1994), Paandav (1995) among others. The only film I remember liking is ‘Satte Pe Satta’. But, to his credit most his films did pretty well at the box office.

Jaanbaaz – 1986 – Feroz Khan – Kalyanji Anandji – Anil Kapoor/Feroz Khan/Dimple/Rekha

A film which had songs like “Pyaar Do Pyaar Lo”…“Har Kisi Ko Nahi Milta”…“Jaane Jana” among others.

I don’t even want to comment on the film as I had no idea what was going on. For me watching Rekha performing to ‘Pyaar Do Pyaar Lo’ with a group of dancers who seemed to be doing some kind of S&M on stage was painful enough.

I however loved watching Sridevi wearing chiffon sarees and dancing to ‘Har Kisi Ko’.

Vijay – 1988 – Yash Chopra – Shiv Hari – Rishi Kapoor/Anil Kapoor/Meenakshi/Kimi

One of the poorer works of Yash Chopra (but infinitely better than ‘Faasle’). But the movie had a pretty decent soundtrack. Songs like “Badal Pe Chalke Aa”…“Zindagi Har Janam”…“Meri Aankhen Hai” were moderate hits then.

The movie was like the song picturization itself. Watching Kimi Katkar in a Yash Chopra movie itself is a shock. Add to that Kimi’s dress and suddenly around 1:14 into the song Anil and Meenakshi pops out from nowhere. Damn scary!

Goonj – 1989 – Jalal Agha – Biddu – Kumar Gaurav/Juhi Chawla

I remember watching this movie when I was really young. The only thing I remember is the song “Saama Yeh Suhana”. It’s one of my favorite songs. The movie however definitely isn’t.

Everytime I watch the song, I cringe at the expression of the actor from 0.40 - 0.42. It’s worth treasuring.

It is surprising whenever I talk about this song, most people think of the song ‘Saama Hai Suhana Suhana’ sung by Kishore Kumar from the movie ‘Ghar Ghar Ki Kahani’. The co-incidence is that Jalal Agha featured in the song ‘Saama Hai Suhana Suhana’ while he was the director of ‘Goonj’. I wonder if he paid tribute to the song by keeping the same lyrics in his own movie.

Yaara Dildara – 1991 – Mirza Brothers – Jatin Lalit – Aasif Sheikh/Ruchika Pandey

The horrible movie had couple of huge hits, “Bin Tere Sanam” and “Tum Hi Humari Manzil”.

“Bin Tere Sanam” was a big hit then but even a bigger hit now thanks to the remix version. The other song that was really popular is “Tum Hi Humari Manzil”. I do not recall much of the movie other than that I couldn’t finish watching it as it was so bad.

I know Aasif Sheikh did lots of movies after that as a character actor. But I have no idea about the actress. Probably her first and last movie.

Drohi – 1992 – Ram Gopal Varma – RD Burman – Nagarjuna/Urmila

One of the most under-rated soundtracks of RD Burman and also of the 90s. The best song obviously is beautiful “Tum Jo Mile To” sung by Suresh Wadkar.

Not only this song, “Dooba Dooba Nashe Mein” sung by Asha Bhonsle is also a very interesting composition. This movie forms the base for the now cult classic “Satya”. Drohi is almost frame to frame similar to Satya. Yet this doesn’t even come near to Satya.

Mashooq – 1992 – Mirza Brothers – Shyam Surender – Ayub Khan/Ayesha Julka

The Mirza Brothers were back after the disaster of Yaara Dildara to create another disaster, Mashooq. But like in Yaara Dildara, this movie also had a great soundtrack.

Couple of songs were huge hits. “Deewana Dil Dhoonde” and “Kaun Ho Tum”.

The other songs, “Yeh Dhadkan Mere Dil Ki”…“Tum Dil To” were also decent enough. Wish the movie was half as decent as the soundtrack.

Phir Teri Kahani Yaad Aayi – 1993 – Mahesh Bhatt – Annu Malik – Rahul Roy/Pooja Bhatt

Probably Annu Malik’s best compositions ever as a complete album. I don’t recall a single song that was even average - forget bad. From “Tere Dar Par Sanam”…“Baadlon Mein Chuup”… “Aane Wala Kal”…“Dil Deta Hai”…Dil Mein Sanam” to my personal favorite “Shairana Si Hai” – every single song is a gem.

Sadly, the movie didn’t even get a theatrical release. It was probably the first movie ever to premiere on TV (Zee TV if I recall correctly). Even then, the movie was horrible to say the least.

Imtihaan – 1994 – Harry Baweja – Annu Malik – Sunny Deol/Raveena/Saif

Two movies released around the same time. One was Deewana starring Rishi Kapoor and Shah Rukh, while the other was Imtihaan. Both had literally the same plot. One was a smash hit, the other flop. Imtihaan was the later and deservingly so. However, the soundtrack of the movie was actually great. It had some of the best songs of 1994.

The soundtrack consists of great songs such as “Is Tarah Aashiqui Ka”…“Chaha To Bahut”…“Do Baate Ho Sakti” among others.

The Gentleman – 1994 – Mahesh Bhatt – AR Rahman/Annu Malik – Chiranjeevi/Juhi Chawla

How can there be any list about soundtracks without the mention of Rahman. So here it is, Mahesh Bhatt’s disaster ‘The Gentleman’. The funny thing with this movie is although the music of three of the biggest hits of the soundtrack is given by AR Rahman, he only gets a ‘thank you’ note at the beginning and Annu Malik’s name is mentioned in the credits.

“Roop Suhana Lagta Hai” and “Chika Bika” were huge hits. The picturization of ‘Chika Bika’ wasn’t even close to that of the original by Prabhu Deva. The movie was again the same modern day Robin Hood story. I don’t recall a single good movie Mahesh Bhatt made from 1994 to 1999 with the exception of Zakhm.

The above list includes 10 terrible movies with great soundtracks. Wish the directors worked half as hard on the screenplays as the music composers did towards their music.

Footnote:

I am focusing only on movies which had great soundtracks but were terrible movies and also flop at the box office. There are a lot of horrible movies with good music which were successful at the box office. Since they were successful, it means certain segment of people appreciated them. So, I am not taking them into consideration.

Who is Taran Adarsh?

2009-02-26T02:03:00.000+05:30

First published on http://passionforcinema.com/pseudo-critics-trade-analysts-and-the-aam-janata/

Whenever we write about someone renowned, we quote something about him. So, here it is.

The genius filmmaker Anurag Kashyap once said, "Taran Adarsh is the son of the person who made the film "Gupt Gyan". It is Taran's favorite movie. Whatever he knows about cinema is from that movie."

After such an introduction, I am sure Taran would be proud of himself if and when he reads this article.

Lets start with what Taran does. He is a trade analyst who also review movies based on the trade indication. He is NOT a film critic. He is supposed to review the movie based on the boxoffice collections and NOT by the merit. So, the best of movies, if it flops, are supposed to be given lower ratings. On a scale of 0-5, the biggest hits are supposed to be rated 5 and the disasters are supposed to be rated 0.

Lets see how honestly he does his work.

[Taran Adarsh's review taken from his own website www.bollywoodhungama.com]

[Boxoffice details of each film is taken from www.boxofficeindia.com]

Let's start from the year 2001.

The following films are the biggest hits of that year.

1. Gadar - Ek Prem Katha. The film collected 70 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran Adarsh gave 3/5

"...GADAR is worth the watch for its brilliant dramatic and confrontation sequences, splendid performances and touching moments..."

@ni's comment: If it's so brilliant and the biggest hit of the year, why give 3/5?

2. Kabhi Khushi Kabhi Gham. The film collected 49 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran however gave the movie 4/5

"...It has style, substance, it takes challenges and doesn't follow formulas -- and that is its biggest strength..."

@ni's comment: It does not follow formulas - LMFAO...

3. Lagaan - Once upon a time in India. The film collected 27 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gave the movie 3/5

"... those who expect the film to be a war waged by Indians against the British will be disappointed to see a film that is devoted completely to a cricket match. This 'battle' is fought with a bat in the hand, not swords or guns..."

@ni's comment: Tussi great ho!

4. Dil Chahta Hai. The movie collected 16 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gave the movie 2/5

"...The biggest flaw of the film is that it has been treated like an English film. To be honest, it is too western for the Indian masses to digest..."

@ni's comment: So you mean masses only understand films like Gupt Gyan that your dad made?

The following film is the disaster of that year.

Yaadein. The movie collected 10 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 2.5/5

"...the fact cannot be denied that the film holds appeal for the youth. It has a modern-day feel and at the end of the show, the feeling is pleasant...Businesswise, the distributors of YAADEIN should recover their investment within the first three/four weeks, which will automatically classify it into the hit category. "

@ni's comment: I wish Subhash Ghai had this much faith in the movie. Did the distributors read the review? I wonder.

2002
The following films are the biggest hits of that year.

1. Devdas. The movie collected 33.25 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 1.5/5

"...it lacks in merits and most importantly, repeat value, which is so very vital to recover the colossal investment that has gone into its making..."

@ni's comment: The biggest hit movie of the year and give 1.5...Good going

2. Raaz. The movie collected 22.50 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 2/5

"...RAAZ is a well-crafted film that has the right combo required for a psycho-thriller - eerie atmosphere and tuneful music. But a theme like this always has its share of non-believers. In that respect, the response to the film will be mixed..."

@ni's comment: This was the biggest hit of that year Taran. What happened? Did you wet your undies while watching or what? Darr ke mare 2/5?

3. Kaante. The movie collected 19.75 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 3.5/5

"...KAANTE takes a step forward in terms of content and technique. An apt example of progressive cinema that breaks the shackles of stereotype..."

@ni's comment: Have you heard a movie named "Reservior Dogs"? I guess not. Anyways, Kaante with its copy-paste Tarantino treatment is progressive for masses and Dil Chahta Hai is too western? Jai Ho!

The following film is the disaster of that year.

Shakti - The Power. The movie collected 6.25 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 2.5/5

"...On the whole, SHAKTI - THE POWER has the power to satiate the appetite of those looking for meaningful entertainment. The hype surrounding the film and the presence of several powerhouse performers should generate a power-packed opening for the film, which in turn should augur well for its investors..."

@ani's comment: Meaningful cinema - OMG!!! LMAFO...

2003
The following films are the biggest hits of that year.

1. Koi Mil Gaya. The movie collected 43.50 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 2.5/5

"... KOI... MIL GAYA tackles a novel concept as far as the Indian screen is concerned. But this genre is bound to meet with mixed reactions, varying from good to just-about-fair to disappointing..."

@ni's comment: The biggest hit of the year gets 2.5/5

2. Kal Ho Na Ho. The movie collected 35.25 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 4/5

"...On the whole, KAL HO NAA HO has all it takes to emerge victorious..."

@ni's comment: Biggest hit gets 2.5/5 and this gets 4/5. Kya ho gaya Taran?

The following film is the disaster of that year.

LOC - Kargil. The movie collected 20 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 4/5

"...On the whole, L.O.C. is a powerful experience. It has power-packed direction and power-packed sequences that remain etched in your memory even after the show has concluded. More than anything else, L.O.C. is a triumph for the master film-maker who has the guts and the vision to make a film of this magnitude!"

@ni's comment: 4/5 to the disaster of the year. Jio!

2004

The following films are the biggest hits of that year.

1. Veer-Zara. The movie collected 41 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 4.5/5

"...On the whole, VEER-ZAARA is a winner all the way - in terms of direction, scripting, music, performances. The film will sweep the box-office like a hurricane and set new records in days to come. A sure-shot blockbuster!"

@ni's comment: This is Taran's highest rating ever! So, according to Taran, Veer-Zara is the greatest film of our times. ***Jai Kaala Bandar***

2. Dhoom. The movie collected 29 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 1.5/5

"...On the whole, DHOOM is a terrible letdown thanks to its insipid script. At the box-office, DHOOM will lose its sparkle after the first day or two of glory!"

@ni's comment: Kya ho gaya? Yash Raj Films se kine interview nahi diya kya?

The following film is the disaster of that year.

Rok Sako To Rok Lo. We couldn't find the collections for the film. Did it release everywhere? I doubt! Taran gives the movie 3/5

"...ROK SAKO TO ROK LO has tremendous youth appeal...it can carve a niche for itself. At the box-office, the film should be patronized by the youth..."

@ni's comment: Oye! You're not reviewing Jo Jeeta Wohi Sikandar. This movie is the almost scene by scene copy of it. Open your eyes Taran ji...

2005

The following films are the biggest hits of that year.

1. No Entry. The movie collected 44.84 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 3.5/5

"...On the whole, NO ENTRY is a joyride that is bound to click with the masses in a big way..."

@ni's comment: Wow! You got one correct at last!!!

2. Bunty Aur Bubli. The movie collected 35.62 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 1.5/5
"...On the whole, BUNTY AUR BABLI just doesn't have the meat to enthrall the moviegoers...the film doesn't have the power to sustain after the initial curiosity subsides...Disappointing!"

@ni's comment: One more Yash Raj Hit. One more misguided review from you!

3. Mangal Pandey. The movie collected 28.32 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 4/5

"...On the whole, MANGAL PANDEY is a film of epic proportions. A genuine attempt at bringing alive a great hero on celluloid, the film will only bring pride and prestige in the domestic market as well as on the international platform."

@ni's comment: So this gets better rating than the biggest hits of the year even though its turns out to be a disappointment of epic proportions. Great job!

The following film is the disaster of that year.

Paheli. The movie collected 13.09 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 4/5

"...On the whole, PAHELI is one of the finest films produced in the recent times. A film like this proves yet again that we don't need to seek inspiration from outsiders [read Hollywood], when the Indian literature is rich enough to provide us with captivating stories. From the business point of view, PAHELI has already proved to be a profitable venture for its producers even before its release and the non-theatrical revenue [satellite rights, et al] will only add to their profits."

@ni's comment: Already profitable before release and yet it turns out to be the disaster of the year. Are you high??? One of the biggest hit of the year gets 1.5/5 and the disaster of the year gets 4/5...Wah wah!

2006

The following films are the biggest hits of that year.

1. Dhoom 2. The movie collected 80.53 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 4.5/5

"...On the whole, DHOOM 2 is a winner all the way."

@ni's comment: So now Dhoom 2 adds to Veer-Zaara to become the best ever reviewed film by Taran Adarsh. Great for Indian cinema!

2. Krissh. The movie collected 73.47 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 4.5/5

"...On the whole, KRRISH is a winner all the way. "

@ni's comment: Krissh becomes the 3rd movie to get the best ever rating. Nice collection! Also don't you know any other sentence than "winner all the way"?

3. Rang De Basanti. The movie collected 51.15 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 2.5/5

"...On the whole, RANG DE BASANTI will have its share of advocates and adversaries. A well-made film, it caters more to the elite and the thinking viewer than the aam junta or the masses..."

@ni's comment: Again 'aam janta' comes into picture. Just coz' you're too dumb to understand metaphors, does that mean 'aam janta' is like you?

The following film is the disaster of that year.

Baabul. The movie collected 15.97 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 3/5

"...On the whole, BAABUL makes a statement in a convincing manner. The film rests on three aces -- emotions, performances and execution -- which will attract the family audiences in large numbers..."

@ni's comment: It really did make a statement. That no matter how many stars you have, a poorly made film will always flop.

2007

The following films are the biggest hits of that year.

1. Om Shanti Om. The movie collected 79.42 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 4/5

"...On the whole, OM SHANTI OM is Bollywood masala in its truest form and also, at its best..."

@ni's comment: Wow! You got another one correct! How many does that make? 2 correct predictions in 5 years? ;)

2. Chak De India. The movie collected 67.69 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 2/5

"...On the whole, CHAK DE INDIA is a well-made product, but its fate at the ticket window wouldn't be as glorious as its intentions..."

@ni's comment: What about your intentions of sabotaging this movie? And how you failed. Lmao...

The following film is the disaster of that year.

Eklavya - The Royal Guard. The movie collected 18.30 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 4/5

"...EKLAVYA - THE ROYAL GUARD has its heart in the right place. A must for every cinegoer!"

@ni's comment: The film had the heart in the right place. The audience didn't. Which basically means another wrong prediction on your part.

2008

The following films are the biggest hits of that year.

1. Ghajini. The movie collected 117.48 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 4.5/5

"...On the whole, GHAJINI is a winner all the way..."

@ni's comment: Phir se "winner all the way". Don't you know any other sentences or what? Just coz' you're such a loser, you have to use the sentence "winner all the way". LMFAO...

2. Rab Ne Bana Di Jodi. The movie collected 85.56 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 2/5

"...On the whole, RAB NE BANA DI JODI is vey desi at heart with a strong start and an equally strong emotional end. Having said that, you cannot deny the fact that you expect much, much more from Aditya Chopra. RAB NE BANA DI JODI is no DILWALE DULHANIYA LE JAYENGE, it's not MOHABBATEIN either. It's lower than that!..."

@ni's comment: Damn man! Don't you get tired trying (in vain) to sabotage films.

The following films are the disasters of that year.

1. Karzzzz. The movie collected 10.93 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 4/5

"...On the whole, KARZZZZ is rich in entertainment. Himesh's tremendous popularity amongst masses, its chartbusting musical score and the fact that it's a remake of a much-loved film will only lure masses in hordes...Damn the pseudo critics who even rubbished KARZ three decades ago. Go by your instinct and have a blast!"

@ni's comment: OMG! You're damning the "pseudo" critics when you're trying to be one since the last 10 years and failing every single day! What a pathetic loser you are...

2. Yuvvraaj. The movie collected 16.95 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 3/5

"...On the whole, YUVVRAAJ is interesting in parts, with the penultimate 20/25 minutes taking the film to an all-time high..."

@ni's comment: Yeah, we can understand. How high a person needs to be to feel the climax takes the movie to an all-time high. You having said that take yourself to an all-time low...

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Taran's predictions:

His all time highest rating for Blockbusters are: 4.5/5
- Veer-Zaara
- Dhoom 2
- Krissh
- Ghajini

His all time highest rating for Disasters are: 4/5
- LOC Kargil
- Paheli
- Eklavya
- Karzzzz

So, according to Taran, Blockbuster and Disaster is same.

So, you yourself can judge what type of Trade Analyst he is...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
He doesn't stop there. He tries to sabotage movies due to personal issues.

Proof 1:

Taran Adarsh vs Anurag Kashyap

No Smoking was given 1/5 and the movie was a disaster.

Dev.D was given a 1/5 rating.

"...On the whole, DEV D is NO SMOKING II. Does one elaborate more?"

The movie till now has grossed 12 crore Net for a 6 crore movie. So, its a Hit. Does one need to elaborate more?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proof 2:

Taran Adarsh vs Yash Raj Films

This is the list of the following Yash Raj releases over the 2 years. Check Taran's rating and the Boxoffice Net collections.

1. Rab Ne Bana Di Jodi - 2/5 - 85.56 crore
2. Roadside Romeo - 2/5 - Not Available
3. Bachna Ae Haseeno - 2.5/5 - 36.64 crore
4. Thoda Pyaar Thoda Magic - 3.5/5 - 21.54 crore
5. Tashan - 1.5/5 - 27.87 crore
6. Aaja Nachle - 1.5/5 - 14.85 crore
7. Laaga Chunri Mein Daag - 1.5/5 - 19.20 crore
8. Chak De India - 2/5 - 67.69 crore
9. Jhoom Barabar Jhoom - 1.5/5 - 25.22 crore
10. Ta Ra Rum Pum - 3.5/5 - 35.02 crore

Just check the ratings and the collections. You will understand what Taran Adarsh is.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proof 3:

Taran Adarsh vs Rakesh Omprakash Mehra

1. Aks - 2/5

"...On the whole, AKS scores in terms of technique, not content. It has Amitabh at his best, a strong visual appeal, foot-tapping music that gels well with the goings-on, but a not-so-impressive second half will prove a stumbling block. If you don't believe in supernatural, you'll probably dispel the concept of the film..."

This review is so funny. If you read it you will find he has praised everything and yet given a 2/5 rating. Taran says if you don't believe in supernatural, you'll probably dispel the concept of the film. The same person now praises movies like Raaz 2 lavishly and gives 3/5. Just coz' ROM made the movie ahead of its times and Taran didn't have the brain to understand it, he trashes it.

2. Rang De Basanti - 2.5/5

"...On the whole, RANG DE BASANTI will have its share of advocates and adversaries. A well-made film, it caters more to the elite and the thinking viewer than the aam junta or the masses..."

The less said the better. We all know what happened after that. As they say...the rest is history...

3. Delhi 6 - 1.5/5

"...DELHI 6 has a terribly boring beginning [first hour], an absorbing middle [second half] and a weak end [climax]..."

Only Taran Adarsh can summarize like this.

Now the film has grossed more than 33 Crore in 3 days. So, Taran Adarsh couldn't digest that.

This is what he did:

"After D6, Rakeysh Omprakash Mehra to make D1, D2, D3, D4, D5?"

http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/features/2009/02/24/4887/index.html

Read the article and you'll understand how dirty can a person be. Just because no one from the Delhi 6 team bothered to go to the crapy Taran Adarsh show, he started sabotaging against the movie.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
At the end all I want to say is...

"Get well soon" and "Get a life, dude!"

One more thing...Taran try watching your face once in the mirror. You will understand what Delhi 6 meant to say.

Cheers...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is for the cynics. Read the following link which proves that Taran's father BK Adarsh really made "Gupt Gyan".

"...the series of films made in the early 1970s by BK Adarsh, father of film critic Taran Adarsh, such as Gupt Gyan..."

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/24441280.cms

I am Legend - A Review

2007-12-22T07:21:00.000+05:30

Having read the novel already, I didn't know how the film will shape up coz the novels ends very grimly as Dr. Robert Neville (Will Smith in the movie) is being captured by the Nightwalkers and he accepts his failure and moves on. Also, the 'Legend' name in the novel came frm the fact that Neville was immune to the infection caused frm the Virus (to be precise the Nightwalkers' bites). So, the Nightwalkers themselves looked upon to Neville as a Legend.

So, when I started to watch the movie, I was quite amused to see that they have changed the plot considerably. But, on a brighter side, it actually made the film better in a way that it had "hope" which lacked in the novel. Definitely a better idea for a feature film.

Coming back to reviewing it, first things first. The opening sequence is the best opening sequence for me this year. Hands Down. Manhattan never looked so lifeless, so lonely, and so devastating.

Note 1# Hands down one of the best Production Design of the year...

I will not delve to much into the plot to spoil it. I will discuss more on the technical aspect of the film which I actually understand more than the writing process

Note 2# Will Smith proves once again he is the biggest salable actor on earth....77.4M opening..phew!!

Note 2.1# Will Smith can act..and act pretty well...!!! Bravo...

Very few films actually portrayed the last man standing on earth so well. There was actually 2 more films made on this topic. The more popular among the 2 is 'The Omega Man' (1978 probably) and I have seen it. It wasn't a good film.

I must admit that for the first half of the movie, 2 things stand out...and stand out in a big way.

#1 The painful, inhuman loneliness of Will Smith.

#2 The Human-Animal bonding. Few films have actually captured the Man-Dog bonding as it is done in here. The plot helps as Sam (the dog) is the only other living character for the first half of the movie. Still, very impressive.

The rest of the movie is fight against the Nightwalkers and some twist and turns which I won't reveal.

But, there are 3-4 really well made shock (horror) scenes. Very neatly done.

Now, the flaw...

I found only one. The CGI of the Nightwalkers could and should have been better. They look almost staright out from the Computer Games

A little more flesh was the need of the hour

Overall:

I really liked the movie and whole heartedly recommend this to everyone. It a little change from the usual Hollywood/Bollywood movies also. And, it does raise a few questions which mutate in our minds long after the film is over.

300 - Movie Review

2007-03-10T11:39:00.000+05:30

I have seen many movies. And, by many I really mean many. But, I have never ever got a sadistic pleasure in my entire life watching limbs getting chopped, people getting hacked. It is so fucking kool...!!! Watching people die never gave me such a high. Its like watching the best ever video game on celluloid.

Where shall I start? First and foremost I think, I must mention about the surrealistic world we are treated to. Its like a dream with stunning images which I thought only existed in paintings.

The film combines elements of the actual battle from 480 B.C. with other clashes between the mighty Spartans and the overwhelming forces of the Persian "god-king" Xerxes but the essence of the legend is intact.

Xerxes, at one point tried to rule all over the world. But, Leonidas, the King of Sparta and his handful (well...actually not) of 300 brave men fought to death to preserve the freedom for Sparta. Their effort provided inspiration for all Spartan soldiers to reunite and fight again.

On one hand, it is about the war of the Spartan against the Persians, on the other it is also how the Queen of Sparta, Gorgo, tries to make all the politicians in the Sparta Assembly understand that the action of Leonidas is just. To prove this, she even agrees to adultery with the traitor Theron who plots against Leonidas.

Gerard Butler as Leonidas, the King of Sparta is awesome. There isn't much of a scope of displaying histrionics here, but still he manages to impress.

One more thing. People might tend to think this is a GUY MOVIE. I beg to differ. Sure barring Gorgo, there isn't a single female character of importance, but Gorgo is the most powerful role after Leonidas. And the ever so pretty Lena Headey plays it gracefully. To make your presence felt in a movie like this is an impressive feat.

Rodrigo Santoro as Xerxes was however a little disappointing. With all his piercings, he looked more funny than menacing.

The love making scenes between Leonadis and Gorgo are like poetry. Shot so awesomely. The only love making scene so brilliantly shot, which I can remember, is in Fight Club.

The background music is simply out of the world. However, I personally would have liked heavy metal tracks played in background while the battle scenes are on. I don't know what the results would have been. But, I would have liked it for sure.

The cinematography and the special effects are so freaking awesome, that its better not to use an adjective to define them. When you watch the war scenes, the only sentence you say is "What the fuck?". Trust me, this time it means in a really good way ;)

To sum up, I think its a merge of Gladiator and Sin City. Well, the best parts of those two movies together will make 300.

Do yourself a favor. Go and watch 300. Your idea about films will definitely change.

disc review: iron maiden | a matter of life and death |

2007-02-17T05:47:00.000+05:30

I do not know why I missed this. It released in September 2006 and I heard it yesterday. What has happened to me? I should be ashamed of myself. I missed an Iron Maiden album…fuck…!!!

Anyways, I guess I will get enough time to screw myself. So, lets start with the album review.

I always get nervous before hearing a new album from a band I like. So many questions arise: Will it be good? Will it be something original? Will it get old? Well, after hearing Iron Maiden's new album, I can finally exhale. After many listens, it's safe to say this is surely one of Maiden's best releases. "A Matter Of Life And Death" is one of the most exhilarating albums of Maiden's legacy.

A Matter of Life and Death is easily Iron Maiden's best album since 1988's Seventh Son of a Seventh Son. It's no storming of the ramparts, though—it’s more of a post-battle body count.

The album begins with "Different World" and "These Colors Don't Run," two strong, memorable anthems. Then the album settles into a darker, more contemplative groove. The specter of war hangs heavy here. "The Longest Day" vividly describes D-Day; "Lord of Light" bemoans "the slaughter of the brotherhood of man"; "Brighter than a Thousand Suns" calls nuclear armament "a race to suicide." Even a rocker like "The Pilgrim" has moody flatted seconds. Atmospheric clean tones abound, like on the heavy, mid-paced "The Reincarnation of Benjamin Breeg." At over seven minutes long, the song is an odd choice for a single, but it's an epic in the grand Iron Maiden tradition. The songwriting throughout is assured, with confident transitions between often disparate riffs. Dickinson's operatic voice is in fine form, and Steve Harris' bass lines are as fluid as ever.

I was completely blown away with "A Matter Of Life And Death." Out of the three Iron Maiden albums released since Bruce Dickinson and Adrian Smith came back into the band, "A Matter Of Life And Death" is defiantly the best one. If you enjoy metal in general, I highly recommend you get this.

Girlfriend

2007-02-06T06:59:00.000+05:30

I always sit in the valley
I spend time there
I try to talk with the nature
It's the only friend I have here

I look up at the clear blue sky
With small clouds here and there
And the valley is lush green
I never knew blue and green makes such a great combination – until I saw it here

I always sit under the same tree
I do not know what tree it is
Or perhaps it's actually good that I do not know her identity
She brings me more peace than my own blood relatives

She's the only girl friend I have
I talk to her all day long
Sometimes she listens to me, sometimes not
But the story goes on…

I think she's very pretty
She's firm, wide and tall
Her branches are like her long hairs
Exactly like what I want in my girl

She looks even better when the wind blows
Her branches move and fall over me
I feel that as a symbol of acceptance
That she wants me to see

Then the rain starts
She becomes soaking wet
Water drops through her branches upon me
I remember, "this is how we first met'

Slowly, everything stops
The sun sets, rain stops, darkness falls, birds go home
I understand it's time up for me now
I have to head for home

I feel sad, as I have to leave
Life back there is full of sorrow
My girl bends down and asks me, 'when will you be back again?'
I say, 'don't worry baby, I'll back again tomorrow'

Lonely

2007-02-06T06:45:00.000+05:30

I sit and watch the sun set

Nobody beside me

I look around, searching for someone

Because I am lonely

I remember the days when I was young

I used to watch sunsets

There used to be a lot of friends then

Now, nobody's with me

I remember when I grew up

I continued watching sunsets

I had my girl with me then

She's not here now; only thing left is her memory

The sun sets, darkness falls

I feel my life's going the same way

There's darkness all over

Because I am lonely