Thursday, February 26, 2009

Who is Taran Adarsh?

First published on http://passionforcinema.com/pseudo-critics-trade-analysts-and-the-aam-janata/

Whenever we write about someone renowned, we quote something about him. So, here it is.

The genius filmmaker Anurag Kashyap once said, "Taran Adarsh is the son of the person who made the film "Gupt Gyan". It is Taran's favorite movie. Whatever he knows about cinema is from that movie."

After such an introduction, I am sure Taran would be proud of himself if and when he reads this article.

Lets start with what Taran does. He is a trade analyst who also review movies based on the trade indication. He is NOT a film critic. He is supposed to review the movie based on the boxoffice collections and NOT by the merit. So, the best of movies, if it flops, are supposed to be given lower ratings. On a scale of 0-5, the biggest hits are supposed to be rated 5 and the disasters are supposed to be rated 0.

Lets see how honestly he does his work.

[Taran Adarsh's review taken from his own website www.bollywoodhungama.com]

[Boxoffice details of each film is taken from www.boxofficeindia.com]

Let's start from the year 2001.

The following films are the biggest hits of that year.

1. Gadar - Ek Prem Katha. The film collected 70 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran Adarsh gave 3/5

"...GADAR is worth the watch for its brilliant dramatic and confrontation sequences, splendid performances and touching moments..."

@ni's comment: If it's so brilliant and the biggest hit of the year, why give 3/5?

2. Kabhi Khushi Kabhi Gham. The film collected 49 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran however gave the movie 4/5

"...It has style, substance, it takes challenges and doesn't follow formulas -- and that is its biggest strength..."

@ni's comment: It does not follow formulas - LMFAO...

3. Lagaan - Once upon a time in India. The film collected 27 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gave the movie 3/5

"... those who expect the film to be a war waged by Indians against the British will be disappointed to see a film that is devoted completely to a cricket match. This 'battle' is fought with a bat in the hand, not swords or guns..."

@ni's comment: Tussi great ho!

4. Dil Chahta Hai. The movie collected 16 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gave the movie 2/5

"...The biggest flaw of the film is that it has been treated like an English film. To be honest, it is too western for the Indian masses to digest..."

@ni's comment: So you mean masses only understand films like Gupt Gyan that your dad made?

The following film is the disaster of that year.

Yaadein. The movie collected 10 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 2.5/5

"...the fact cannot be denied that the film holds appeal for the youth. It has a modern-day feel and at the end of the show, the feeling is pleasant...Businesswise, the distributors of YAADEIN should recover their investment within the first three/four weeks, which will automatically classify it into the hit category. "

@ni's comment: I wish Subhash Ghai had this much faith in the movie. Did the distributors read the review? I wonder.

2002
The following films are the biggest hits of that year.

1. Devdas. The movie collected 33.25 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 1.5/5

"...it lacks in merits and most importantly, repeat value, which is so very vital to recover the colossal investment that has gone into its making..."

@ni's comment: The biggest hit movie of the year and give 1.5...Good going

2. Raaz. The movie collected 22.50 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 2/5

"...RAAZ is a well-crafted film that has the right combo required for a psycho-thriller - eerie atmosphere and tuneful music. But a theme like this always has its share of non-believers. In that respect, the response to the film will be mixed..."

@ni's comment: This was the biggest hit of that year Taran. What happened? Did you wet your undies while watching or what? Darr ke mare 2/5?

3. Kaante. The movie collected 19.75 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 3.5/5

"...KAANTE takes a step forward in terms of content and technique. An apt example of progressive cinema that breaks the shackles of stereotype..."

@ni's comment: Have you heard a movie named "Reservior Dogs"? I guess not. Anyways, Kaante with its copy-paste Tarantino treatment is progressive for masses and Dil Chahta Hai is too western? Jai Ho!

The following film is the disaster of that year.

Shakti - The Power. The movie collected 6.25 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 2.5/5

"...On the whole, SHAKTI - THE POWER has the power to satiate the appetite of those looking for meaningful entertainment. The hype surrounding the film and the presence of several powerhouse performers should generate a power-packed opening for the film, which in turn should augur well for its investors..."

@ani's comment: Meaningful cinema - OMG!!! LMAFO...

2003
The following films are the biggest hits of that year.

1. Koi Mil Gaya. The movie collected 43.50 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 2.5/5

"... KOI... MIL GAYA tackles a novel concept as far as the Indian screen is concerned. But this genre is bound to meet with mixed reactions, varying from good to just-about-fair to disappointing..."

@ni's comment: The biggest hit of the year gets 2.5/5

2. Kal Ho Na Ho.
The movie collected 35.25 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 4/5

"...On the whole, KAL HO NAA HO has all it takes to emerge victorious..."

@ni's comment: Biggest hit gets 2.5/5 and this gets 4/5. Kya ho gaya Taran?

The following film is the disaster of that year.

LOC - Kargil. The movie collected 20 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 4/5

"...On the whole, L.O.C. is a powerful experience. It has power-packed direction and power-packed sequences that remain etched in your memory even after the show has concluded. More than anything else, L.O.C. is a triumph for the master film-maker who has the guts and the vision to make a film of this magnitude!"

@ni's comment: 4/5 to the disaster of the year. Jio!

2004

The following films are the biggest hits of that year.

1. Veer-Zara. The movie collected 41 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 4.5/5

"...On the whole, VEER-ZAARA is a winner all the way - in terms of direction, scripting, music, performances. The film will sweep the box-office like a hurricane and set new records in days to come. A sure-shot blockbuster!"

@ni's comment: This is Taran's highest rating ever! So, according to Taran, Veer-Zara is the greatest film of our times. ***Jai Kaala Bandar***

2. Dhoom. The movie collected 29 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 1.5/5

"...On the whole, DHOOM is a terrible letdown thanks to its insipid script. At the box-office, DHOOM will lose its sparkle after the first day or two of glory!"

@ni's comment: Kya ho gaya? Yash Raj Films se kine interview nahi diya kya?

The following film is the disaster of that year.

Rok Sako To Rok Lo. We couldn't find the collections for the film. Did it release everywhere? I doubt! Taran gives the movie 3/5

"...ROK SAKO TO ROK LO has tremendous youth appeal...it can carve a niche for itself. At the box-office, the film should be patronized by the youth..."

@ni's comment: Oye! You're not reviewing Jo Jeeta Wohi Sikandar. This movie is the almost scene by scene copy of it. Open your eyes Taran ji...

2005

The following films are the biggest hits of that year.

1. No Entry. The movie collected 44.84 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 3.5/5

"...On the whole, NO ENTRY is a joyride that is bound to click with the masses in a big way..."

@ni's comment: Wow! You got one correct at last!!!


2. Bunty Aur Bubli.
The movie collected 35.62 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 1.5/5
"...On the whole, BUNTY AUR BABLI just doesn't have the meat to enthrall the moviegoers...the film doesn't have the power to sustain after the initial curiosity subsides...Disappointing!"

@ni's comment: One more Yash Raj Hit. One more misguided review from you!

3. Mangal Pandey.
The movie collected 28.32 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 4/5

"...On the whole, MANGAL PANDEY is a film of epic proportions. A genuine attempt at bringing alive a great hero on celluloid, the film will only bring pride and prestige in the domestic market as well as on the international platform."

@ni's comment: So this gets better rating than the biggest hits of the year even though its turns out to be a disappointment of epic proportions. Great job!

The following film is the disaster of that year.

Paheli. The movie collected 13.09 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 4/5

"...
On the whole, PAHELI is one of the finest films produced in the recent times. A film like this proves yet again that we don't need to seek inspiration from outsiders [read Hollywood], when the Indian literature is rich enough to provide us with captivating stories. From the business point of view, PAHELI has already proved to be a profitable venture for its producers even before its release and the non-theatrical revenue [satellite rights, et al] will only add to their profits."

@ni's comment: Already profitable before release and yet it turns out to be the disaster of the year. Are you high??? One of the biggest hit of the year gets 1.5/5 and the disaster of the year gets 4/5...Wah wah!

2006

The following films are the biggest hits of that year.

1. Dhoom 2. The movie collected 80.53 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 4.5/5

"...On the whole, DHOOM 2 is a winner all the way."

@ni's comment: So now Dhoom 2 adds to Veer-Zaara to become the best ever reviewed film by Taran Adarsh. Great for Indian cinema!

2. Krissh.
The movie collected 73.47 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 4.5/5

"...On the whole, KRRISH is a winner all the way. "

@ni's comment: Krissh becomes the 3rd movie to get the best ever rating. Nice collection! Also don't you know any other sentence than "winner all the way"?

3. Rang De Basanti
. The movie collected 51.15 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 2.5/5

"...On the whole, RANG DE BASANTI will have its share of advocates and adversaries. A well-made film, it caters more to the elite and the thinking viewer than the aam junta or the masses..."

@ni's comment: Again 'aam janta' comes into picture. Just coz' you're too dumb to understand metaphors, does that mean 'aam janta' is like you?

The following film is the disaster of that year.

Baabul. The movie collected 15.97 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 3/5

"...
On the whole, BAABUL makes a statement in a convincing manner. The film rests on three aces -- emotions, performances and execution -- which will attract the family audiences in large numbers..."

@ni's comment: It really did make a statement. That no matter how many stars you have, a poorly made film will always flop.

2007

The following films are the biggest hits of that year.

1. Om Shanti Om. The movie collected 79.42 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 4/5

"...On the whole, OM SHANTI OM is Bollywood masala in its truest form and also, at its best..."

@ni's comment: Wow! You got another one correct! How many does that make? 2 correct predictions in 5 years? ;)

2. Chak De India. The movie collected 67.69 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 2/5

"...On the whole, CHAK DE INDIA is a well-made product, but its fate at the ticket window wouldn't be as glorious as its intentions..."

@ni's comment: What about your intentions of sabotaging this movie? And how you failed. Lmao...

The following film is the disaster of that year.

Eklavya - The Royal Guard.
The movie collected 18.30 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 4/5

"...EKLAVYA - THE ROYAL GUARD has its heart in the right place. A must for every cinegoer!"

@ni's comment: The film had the heart in the right place. The audience didn't. Which basically means another wrong prediction on your part.

2008

The following films are the biggest hits of that year.

1. Ghajini. The movie collected 117.48 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 4.5/5

"...On the whole, GHAJINI is a winner all the way..."

@ni's comment: Phir se "winner all the way". Don't you know any other sentences or what? Just coz' you're such a loser, you have to use the sentence "winner all the way". LMFAO...

2. Rab Ne Bana Di Jodi. The movie collected 85.56 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 2/5

"...On the whole, RAB NE BANA DI JODI is vey desi at heart with a strong start and an equally strong emotional end. Having said that, you cannot deny the fact that you expect much, much more from Aditya Chopra. RAB NE BANA DI JODI is no DILWALE DULHANIYA LE JAYENGE, it's not MOHABBATEIN either. It's lower than that!..."

@ni's comment: Damn man! Don't you get tired trying (in vain) to sabotage films.

The following films are the disasters of that year.

1. Karzzzz. The movie collected 10.93 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 4/5

"...On the whole, KARZZZZ is rich in entertainment. Himesh's tremendous popularity amongst masses, its chartbusting musical score and the fact that it's a remake of a much-loved film will only lure masses in hordes...Damn the pseudo critics who even rubbished KARZ three decades ago. Go by your instinct and have a blast!"

@ni's comment: OMG! You're damning the "pseudo" critics when you're trying to be one since the last 10 years and failing every single day! What a pathetic loser you are...

2. Yuvvraaj. The movie collected 16.95 crore Net at the domestic boxoffice. Taran gives the movie 3/5

"...On the whole, YUVVRAAJ is interesting in parts, with the penultimate 20/25 minutes taking the film to an all-time high..."

@ni's comment: Yeah, we can understand. How high a person needs to be to feel the climax takes the movie to an all-time high. You having said that take yourself to an all-time low...

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Taran's predictions:

His all time highest rating for Blockbusters are: 4.5/5
- Veer-Zaara
- Dhoom 2
- Krissh
- Ghajini

His all time highest rating for Disasters are: 4/5
- LOC Kargil
- Paheli
- Eklavya
- Karzzzz

So, according to Taran, Blockbuster and Disaster is same.

So, you yourself can judge what type of Trade Analyst he is...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
He doesn't stop there. He tries to sabotage movies due to personal issues.

Proof 1:

Taran Adarsh vs Anurag Kashyap

No Smoking was given 1/5 and the movie was a disaster.

Dev.D was given a 1/5 rating.

"...
On the whole, DEV D is NO SMOKING II. Does one elaborate more?"

The movie till now has grossed 12 crore Net for a 6 crore movie. So, its a Hit. Does one need to elaborate more?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proof 2:

Taran Adarsh vs Yash Raj Films

This is the list of the following Yash Raj releases over the 2 years. Check Taran's rating and the Boxoffice Net collections.

1. Rab Ne Bana Di Jodi - 2/5 - 85.56 crore
2. Roadside Romeo - 2/5 - Not Available
3. Bachna Ae Haseeno - 2.5/5 - 36.64
crore
4. Thoda Pyaar Thoda Magic - 3.5/5 - 21.54 crore
5. Tashan - 1.5/5 - 27.87 crore
6. Aaja Nachle - 1.5/5 - 14.85 crore
7. Laaga Chunri Mein Daag - 1.5/5 - 19.20 crore
8. Chak De India - 2/5 - 67.69 crore
9. Jhoom Barabar Jhoom - 1.5/5 - 25.22 crore
10. Ta Ra Rum Pum - 3.5/5 - 35.02 crore

Just check the ratings and the collections. You will understand what Taran Adarsh is.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proof 3:

Taran Adarsh vs Rakesh Omprakash Mehra

1. Aks - 2/5

"...
On the whole, AKS scores in terms of technique, not content. It has Amitabh at his best, a strong visual appeal, foot-tapping music that gels well with the goings-on, but a not-so-impressive second half will prove a stumbling block. If you don't believe in supernatural, you'll probably dispel the concept of the film..."

This review is so funny. If you read it you will find he has praised everything and yet given a 2/5 rating. Taran says if you don't believe in supernatural, you'll probably dispel the concept of the film. The same person now praises movies like Raaz 2 lavishly and gives 3/5. Just coz' ROM made the movie ahead of its times and Taran didn't have the brain to understand it, he trashes it.

2. Rang De Basanti - 2.5/5

"...On the whole, RANG DE BASANTI will have its share of advocates and adversaries. A well-made film, it caters more to the elite and the thinking viewer than the aam junta or the masses..."

The less said the better. We all know what happened after that. As they say...the rest is history...


3. Delhi 6 - 1.5/5

"...
DELHI 6 has a terribly boring beginning [first hour], an absorbing middle [second half] and a weak end [climax]..."

Only Taran Adarsh can summarize like this.

Now the film has grossed more than 33 Crore in 3 days. So, Taran Adarsh couldn't digest that.

This is what he did:

"After D6, Rakeysh Omprakash Mehra to make D1, D2, D3, D4, D5?"

http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/features/2009/02/24/4887/index.html

Read the article and you'll understand
how dirty can a person be. Just because no one from the Delhi 6 team bothered to go to the crapy Taran Adarsh show, he started sabotaging against the movie.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
At the end all I want to say is...

"Get well soon" and "Get a life, dude!"

One more thing...Taran try watching your face once in the mirror. You will understand what Delhi 6 meant to say.

Cheers...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is for the cynics. Read the following link which proves that Taran's father BK Adarsh really made "Gupt Gyan".

"...the series of films made in the early 1970s by BK Adarsh, father of film critic Taran Adarsh, such as Gupt Gyan..."

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/24441280.cms

Saturday, December 22, 2007

I am Legend - A Review

Having read the novel already, I didn't know how the film will shape up coz the novels ends very grimly as Dr. Robert Neville (Will Smith in the movie) is being captured by the Nightwalkers and he accepts his failure and moves on. Also, the 'Legend' name in the novel came frm the fact that Neville was immune to the infection caused frm the Virus (to be precise the Nightwalkers' bites). So, the Nightwalkers themselves looked upon to Neville as a Legend.

So, when I started to watch the movie, I was quite amused to see that they have changed the plot considerably. But, on a brighter side, it actually made the film better in a way that it had "hope" which lacked in the novel. Definitely a better idea for a feature film.

Coming back to reviewing it, first things first. The opening sequence is the best opening sequence for me this year. Hands Down. Manhattan never looked so lifeless, so lonely, and so devastating.

Note 1# Hands down one of the best Production Design of the year...

I will not delve to much into the plot to spoil it. I will discuss more on the technical aspect of the film which I actually understand more than the writing process

Note 2# Will Smith proves once again he is the biggest salable actor on earth....77.4M opening..phew!!

Note 2.1# Will Smith can act..and act pretty well...!!! Bravo...

Very few films actually portrayed the last man standing on earth so well. There was actually 2 more films made on this topic. The more popular among the 2 is 'The Omega Man' (1978 probably) and I have seen it. It wasn't a good film.

I must admit that for the first half of the movie, 2 things stand out...and stand out in a big way.

#1 The painful, inhuman loneliness of Will Smith.

#2 The Human-Animal bonding. Few films have actually captured the Man-Dog bonding as it is done in here. The plot helps as Sam (the dog) is the only other living character for the first half of the movie. Still, very impressive.

The rest of the movie is fight against the Nightwalkers and some twist and turns which I won't reveal.

But, there are 3-4 really well made shock (horror) scenes. Very neatly done.

Now, the flaw...

I found only one. The CGI of the Nightwalkers could and should have been better. They look almost staright out from the Computer Games

A little more flesh was the need of the hour

Overall:

I really liked the movie and whole heartedly recommend this to everyone. It a little change from the usual Hollywood/Bollywood movies also. And, it does raise a few questions which mutate in our minds long after the film is over.

Saturday, March 10, 2007

300 - Movie Review

I have seen many movies. And, by many I really mean many. But, I have never ever got a sadistic pleasure in my entire life watching limbs getting chopped, people getting hacked. It is so fucking kool...!!! Watching people die never gave me such a high. Its like watching the best ever video game on celluloid.

Where shall I start? First and foremost I think, I must mention about the surrealistic world we are treated to. Its like a dream with stunning images which I thought only existed in paintings.

The film combines elements of the actual battle from 480 B.C. with other clashes between the mighty Spartans and the overwhelming forces of the Persian "god-king" Xerxes but the essence of the legend is intact.

Xerxes, at one point tried to rule all over the world. But, Leonidas, the King of Sparta and his handful (well...actually not) of 300 brave men fought to death to preserve the freedom for Sparta. Their effort provided inspiration for all Spartan soldiers to reunite and fight again.

On one hand, it is about the war of the Spartan against the Persians, on the other it is also how the Queen of Sparta, Gorgo, tries to make all the politicians in the Sparta Assembly understand that the action of Leonidas is just. To prove this, she even agrees to adultery with the traitor Theron who plots against Leonidas.

Gerard Butler as Leonidas, the King of Sparta is awesome. There isn't much of a scope of displaying histrionics here, but still he manages to impress.

One more thing. People might tend to think this is a GUY MOVIE. I beg to differ. Sure barring Gorgo, there isn't a single female character of importance, but Gorgo is the most powerful role after Leonidas. And the ever so pretty Lena Headey plays it gracefully. To make your presence felt in a movie like this is an impressive feat.

Rodrigo Santoro as Xerxes was however a little disappointing. With all his piercings, he looked more funny than menacing.

The love making scenes between Leonadis and Gorgo are like poetry. Shot so awesomely. The only love making scene so brilliantly shot, which I can remember, is in Fight Club.

The background music is simply out of the world. However, I personally would have liked heavy metal tracks played in background while the battle scenes are on. I don't know what the results would have been. But, I would have liked it for sure.

The cinematography and the special effects are so freaking awesome, that its better not to use an adjective to define them. When you watch the war scenes, the only sentence you say is "What the fuck?". Trust me, this time it means in a really good way ;)

To sum up, I think its a merge of Gladiator and Sin City. Well, the best parts of those two movies together will make 300.

Do yourself a favor. Go and watch 300. Your idea about films will definitely change.

Saturday, February 17, 2007

disc review: iron maiden | a matter of life and death |




I do not know why I missed this. It released in September 2006 and I heard it yesterday. What has happened to me? I should be ashamed of myself. I missed an Iron Maiden album…fuck…!!!

Anyways, I guess I will get enough time to screw myself. So, lets start with the album review.

I always get nervous before hearing a new album from a band I like. So many questions arise: Will it be good? Will it be something original? Will it get old? Well, after hearing Iron Maiden's new album, I can finally exhale. After many listens, it's safe to say this is surely one of Maiden's best releases. "A Matter Of Life And Death" is one of the most exhilarating albums of Maiden's legacy.

A Matter of Life and Death is easily Iron Maiden's best album since 1988's Seventh Son of a Seventh Son. It's no storming of the ramparts, though—it’s more of a post-battle body count.

The album begins with "Different World" and "These Colors Don't Run," two strong, memorable anthems. Then the album settles into a darker, more contemplative groove. The specter of war hangs heavy here. "The Longest Day" vividly describes D-Day; "Lord of Light" bemoans "the slaughter of the brotherhood of man"; "Brighter than a Thousand Suns" calls nuclear armament "a race to suicide." Even a rocker like "The Pilgrim" has moody flatted seconds. Atmospheric clean tones abound, like on the heavy, mid-paced "The Reincarnation of Benjamin Breeg." At over seven minutes long, the song is an odd choice for a single, but it's an epic in the grand Iron Maiden tradition. The songwriting throughout is assured, with confident transitions between often disparate riffs. Dickinson's operatic voice is in fine form, and Steve Harris' bass lines are as fluid as ever.

I was completely blown away with "A Matter Of Life And Death." Out of the three Iron Maiden albums released since Bruce Dickinson and Adrian Smith came back into the band, "A Matter Of Life And Death" is defiantly the best one. If you enjoy metal in general, I highly recommend you get this.

Tuesday, February 6, 2007

Girlfriend

I always sit in the valley
I spend time there
I try to talk with the nature
It's the only friend I have here

I look up at the clear blue sky
With small clouds here and there
And the valley is lush green
I never knew blue and green makes such a great combination – until I saw it here

I always sit under the same tree
I do not know what tree it is
Or perhaps it's actually good that I do not know her identity
She brings me more peace than my own blood relatives

She's the only girl friend I have
I talk to her all day long
Sometimes she listens to me, sometimes not
But the story goes on…

I think she's very pretty
She's firm, wide and tall
Her branches are like her long hairs
Exactly like what I want in my girl

She looks even better when the wind blows
Her branches move and fall over me
I feel that as a symbol of acceptance
That she wants me to see

Then the rain starts
She becomes soaking wet
Water drops through her branches upon me
I remember, "this is how we first met'

Slowly, everything stops
The sun sets, rain stops, darkness falls, birds go home
I understand it's time up for me now
I have to head for home

I feel sad, as I have to leave
Life back there is full of sorrow
My girl bends down and asks me, 'when will you be back again?'
I say, 'don't worry baby, I'll back again tomorrow'

Lonely

I sit and watch the sun set

Nobody beside me

I look around, searching for someone

Because I am lonely


I remember the days when I was young

I used to watch sunsets

There used to be a lot of friends then

Now, nobody's with me


I remember when I grew up

I continued watching sunsets

I had my girl with me then

She's not here now; only thing left is her memory


The sun sets, darkness falls

I feel my life's going the same way

There's darkness all over

Because I am lonely