15th Kolkata Film Festival 2009 - Day 1

With so many films to choose from I was really confused. I also had to make sure I choose movies by looking that their running time. Finally, after a few hours I was done with my schedule for Kolkata Film Festival. I will be watching 26 movies 7 days. Phew! Some crazy week this is going to be.

I started with Fellini as I thought most people would have seen his work so the theater would be less populated. And I was correct indeed.


Variety Lights
Dir: Federico Fellini
Italy/ 93 min

I really wanted to watch the movie, as it is Fellini’s debut film as a director. I was surprised to see that it is unlike most of Fellini’s work. It has a very straightforward narrative and it is completely void of any symbolism. The narrative is similar to `La Strada’ and `Nights of Cabiria.’

The film tells the story of a troupe of performers and what happens when a beautiful, young woman with dreams of perusing her career in showbiz joins the troupe. How the equations of relationship change and how much the troupe and the people in it are affected by it. The three main leads, Peppino De Filippo (as Checco), Carla Del Poggio (as Liliana) and Fellini’s wife Giulietta Masina (as Melina Amour) give superlative performances. The film is highly enjoyable with lots of humor thrown in. The ‘behind the scenes’ of the performing troupe is shown with lots of detailing.

Variety Lights is definitely not among Fellini’s best works, but still a very enjoyable movie with good performances.


Lost Song
Dir: Rodrique Jean
Canada/ 102 min

After beginning with Fellini’s movie, I was worried if the next movie would not meet the already set expectations. Just like I thought, the second movie was a damp squib.

Rodrigue Jean’s Lost Song tells the story of a couple, Pierre (Patrick Goyette) and Elisabeth (Suzie LeBlanc), and their struggle with post-partum depression. While the subject is interesting, the execution is absolutely not. So much so that I was wondering what was the necessity of the first 30 minutes. It seemed like 3 or 4 sequences over and over again. It felt like a montage of similar sequences without making any sense. It was frustratingly slow.

The characterization of Elizabeth, the mother, is very uneven. So sequences which should have resulted in sympathy towards the character, results in cheap shocks for the confused audience. The only plus point of the movie is the superb performance of Suzie Le Blanc as Elizabeth, the mother suffering from post-partum depression.

But that ultimately does not save the movie from becoming frustratingly slow and confusing garbage.


The Desert Within
Dir: Rodrigo Pla
Mexico/ 112 min

This one completely took me by surprise. I had plans to watch some other movie. But due to the excess crowd I went to watch Rodrigo Pla’s The Desert Within. The best decision of the day I took!

The backdrop of the film is 1920s when Mexico government banned Catholicism and persecuted its followers. The film tells the story of Elias (Mario Zaragoza) and how he puts his family into trouble by trying to have his unborn child Baptized. To redeem himself and his family of his sins, Elias starts building a church. What happens to the family after the church is built forms the crux of the film.

This movie is a powerful tale about the obsessive pursuit of redemption and the toll it takes on the family. The film is divided into four chapters: Sin, Penance, Sign and Pardon. By the time the movie ends, Elias has become a tragic figure of Shakespearean proportions.

The best part of the movie is the usage of animation along with live action and how perfectly both blends. The cinematography is breathtaking. The acting is uniformly good but Mario Zaragoza takes the cake with a superb performance.

For me, The Desert Within was the best movie of the day.


Lake Tahoe
Dir: Fernando Eimbcke
Mexico/ 85 min

Fernando Eimbcke’s Lake Tahoe is a lovely, little indie about coming of age. The film tells the story of Juan (Diego Cataño), who crashed his car to a post and his (mis) adventures in trying to find a mechanic to repair his car. There is also a parallel story about dealing with the loss of his father.

Fernando Eimbcke seems to be inspired by Jim Jarmusch that is evident in the way Lake Tahoe is shot. The luminous long shots, the wide-angle cinematography and cut into segments with blackouts – all reminiscent of Jim Jarmusch’s early works. The deadpan look on Juan’s face, the lack of characters in the movie and on the streets, all add on to show the emptiness in Juan’s life following his father’s death.

The film is fairly enjoyable with dry humor throughout. The only issue with the movie is the editing pattern. The blackouts used in the movie are so long and repetitive and after a point it becomes tedious and starts affecting the charm of the movie.

Yet with all its flaws, Lake Tahoe is a rewarding, little indie that deserves a watch.

Wake Up Sid - Talking Points

This is NOT a review. These are some points which I felt are necessary to discuss.

The term ‘Coming of age’ is, quintessentially, Hindi cinema. The hero, not always necessarily a very young man, is almost always jobless and does not have much maturity in understanding his responsibilities. Yet, the heroine still falls for him. And by the time the movie ends, we get to see the transformation of this hero into a more mature, understanding-his-responsibilities who gets-the-girl man! If this is not ‘coming of age’, then what is? It’s just that our filmmakers have been more forthcoming and liberal in using the tag ‘coming of age’ in the last few years.

The basic premise of Wake Up Sid is not exactly ground-breaking. Sid, a spoilt but privileged college student, with no sense of purpose or responsibilities, wakes up to life after interacting with Aisha. The only ‘hatke’ thing here is that Aisha, the heroine, is older and supposedly more mature than him.

Right from the initial scene, when we see Sid, the film travels to known territory. Sid is least interested in his studies and thinks that life is a big party. His rich parents don’t seem to be too bothered and happily pay his credit card bills. Firstly, why is it that, urban, rich kids are always shown to be so confused with life? Also, why is it that, neither of Sid’s parents say anything to him when they are aware that he his least bit interested in his studies? Isn’t education of any importance to them? Especially so, when we hear Sid’s mother complaining that Sid was a good student in school. Yet, she chooses to be a doting mother who has nothing to say. Also why do most fathers try and bribe their kids with a Porsche (or a Mercedes or BMW) to join their business when they have just finished their degree (B.Com in the case of this movie)?

These things are highly questionable.

Now let’s focus on Aisha. She has come to Mumbai all the way from Kolkata to start her life. She says, she has no friends, or family here. Yet, and just after a couple of days in Mumbai, she manages to get an apartment of her own. The transformation of that apartment into a designer suite is hard to take seriously. We see Aisha along with Sid and his friends painting the apartment on their own because Aisha cannot afford much money. Yet, the drapes used in the apartment are of designer quality. She uses a Mac but cannot afford a washing machine. Details, anyone? These things just don’t fit in. I wonder if everyone has to look his or her best and stay in the best possible places no matter what their backgrounds are just because it is a Karan Johar movie!!

After Sid moves out of the house and stays with Aisha, not even once do we get to see a scene where his parents call him up and persuade him to come back home. Is that normal? Much later, we do see his mother coming to the apartment, and offering Aisha money instead of actually staying back till Sid comes and persuading him to return back to their house. Nor do we see a single scene where Sid’s parents are concerned about Sid abandoning them and the house. Aren’t they bothered at all?

One might say that some things are obvious and if explained, will be akin to spoon-feeding. I agree, too. But if that is the case, then why write a screenplay with a clichéd story. Isn’t a dad’s trying to bribe his son with a car clichéd? Isn’t showing a doting mother saying nothing to her spoilt son clichéd?

So far my article might seem to be a rant. Yes, it is. It is a sin to have such an ordinary first half that is so full of clichés for a movie whose second half is just brilliant! The treatment of the second half where we see two parallel coming-of-age stories is just exceptional. That completely elevates this movie and makes the movie a decent enough watch.

The movie benefits immensely from the technical department. The cinematography by Anil Mehta makes Bombay look beautiful. The background score elevates the movie. Amit Trivedi rocks with 'Iktara'.

But what makes the movie are the performances. Ranbir Kapoor just nails it. He IS Sid. It is tough to share screen space with the most talented actress of our times - Konkona Sen Sharma. But Ranbir actually does exceptionally well. Konkona is always good. She can never be even average. But the surprise package of the movie is Shikha Talsania who plays Sid's friend Laxmi. She is just so natural.

Anupam Kher and Supriya Pathak are wasted as their role is far too cliched. But what is Rahul 'the stud who never gets the girl' Khanna doing here? It is the same role he did in Love Aaj Kal.

The direction of Ayan Mukherji is so assured. It is a pity that his script doesn’t quite compliment his directorial skills. Had he worked on the script a bit more, we could have had one of the best “coming of age” movies of our times.

I guess he needs to ‘wake up’ now! Or is it Karan Johan who needs to wake up?

Corporate Burnout

There is a scene in ‘Requiem for a Dream’ where director Darren Aronofsky uses a montage where multiple things are happening concurrently with different characters in the movie. The way that montage has been edited gives us a feeling of a machine working.

After having worked as a Database Administrator for two years, I often find myself identifying to that scene. My education and work happened in a very similar way depicted in that montage. I finished my Bachelor of Engineering, worked for a year, followed that with pursuing a Masters in Engineering and worked again for another year. Although it was solely my decision to study Engineering and work, and while I did fairly well in both, there was a sense of frustration building up in me all along. There came in a point when work just did not seem creative or interesting enough!

I have been fascinated about cinema since my childhood. As I grew up, I also started understanding and appreciating the different technical aspects of it rather than the mere gloss and glory. Editing to me is the most creative technical aspect of film-making. Depending on how you edit a film, the entire perception towards it can change.

When I was working in Bangalore and every time I went home, I used to assist a family friend who is a documentary film-maker. I tried to learn about shot selection, camera angles, what to use as a subject, how to edit and the like. I however learnt much more while having discussions with him about the movie. When I said this camera angle suits better, he would defend himself and that two-way dialogue used to be fascinating. His explanation about why he wanted to compose a particular shot as per his vision and not mine, educated me a lot more than just handling the camera would have perhaps.

Later when I was working in Dallas, I joined an independent film club where they would watch Indie films every weekend and discuss them. Hearing so many points of view of various people from different walks of life, all gathered together just for their love of cinema, triggered my longing to learn editing even further.

So here I am a corporate burnout, currently without a job, waiting to join a film institute to learn editing, not sure what the future holds, with nothing but pride and satisfaction that atleast I am going to do what I always wanted.

Wanted | The Return of Machismo

When we search the word ‘Hero’ in the dictionary, it says ‘a man of distinguished courage or ability, admired for his brave deeds and noble qualities’. After watching Wanted one gets the same feeling. Wanted is all about Hero-ism. It brings back the days when Hindi cinema was about macho-ism. Where the hero would be so larger than life that nothing will happen to him and he will get away with everything he wants to do. When Hindi cinema is going through a change, the change being more real life stories attempted and more so called ‘multiplex movies’ are being made, it feels nice to see a true unpretentious film about being larger than life.

Salman plays Radhe, a hitman who works for anyone who quotes the highest. Then there are a few ‘Bhais’ who are trying to rule over Mumbai. Among the ‘Bhais’, the main competition is among Golden gang headed by Gani Bhai (Prakash Raj) and Data Pawle gang. Obviously there is a corrupt cop, Inspector Talpade (played by Mahesh Manjrekar) and an honest Police Commissioner, Ashraf Khan (Govind Namdeo). How can I forget the seedhi-saadhi girl (Ayesha Takia Azmi)? Well Salman works for Golden gang and starts cleaning the members of the other gangs. Meanwhile Govind Namdeo promises to have a clean Mumbai and Mahesh Manjrekar’s lustful eyes fall on Ayesha Takia. Ayesha however seems to have fallen in love with Salman even after watching him on a killing spree. If only more girls were there like her! Anyway, there is not much novelty in the storyline and the movie doesn’t claim that.

But the film is fairly entertaining. The entire movie revolves around Salman. It is about the aura of macho-ism he creates. After a long time he delivers. This movie does not require him to display his histrionics. It needs him to create an environment where everything is larger than life. Thanks to the editing and the action set pieces, he manages that. When Salman takes on more than 10 people alone, one doesn’t laugh but feels confident that this guy can beat the crap out of those 10 people. This dynamism succeeds in making the film entertaining.

Ayesha Takia Azmi however disappoints big time. Her character is just not believable. I mean it is just un-fathomable that an educated, urban girl will like a person like Salman even after watching him on rampage. Her scenes with Salman just doesn’t work. The scenes inside the lift and on the railway station are so badly written that one cringes. One person who really entertains with his performance is Prakash Raj. His character is very over the top. There was every chance to make a caricature of out it. To his credit he balances the comic element and the negativity pretty well. Mahesh Manjrekar, Govind Namdeo, Vinod Khanna and Inder Kumar are all decent in their roles.

The film however suffers from a pathetic comedy track. It is crude which probably goes well with the story and treatment. What does not work is the fact that most of the comic scenes are just not funny and seems completely out of context.

The music also is of mixed variety. ‘Jalwa’ is the only song that is good. The rest of the songs are bad and also the placement is very poor. They are just not needed. It would have helped the film immensely had a couple of songs been edited out.

Technically however the movie pretty good. Cinematography by Nirav Shah and S Sriram is good. The background score by Salim-Suleiman although a tad loud fits well with the movie. The two technical aspects which however completely elevate the movie are editing and action. The editing, especially during the action sequences is really good. The action set pieces created by Vijayan Master are simply phenomenal. We are used to stylized action for a long time now. This is just raw violence and it looks spectacular on screen. One also needs to applaud Salman for executing them with gusto. The climax action sequence (although copied from the French movie Banlieue 13) is just outstanding.

Prabhu Deva should be given credit for utilizing Salman Khan properly. However he should have edited the comic track and a couple of songs from the movie which would have made the film crisper and better.

At a time when we are appreciating dumb, mindless, popcorn flicks like Transformers 2 and G.I.Joe, we probably should give Wanted a fair try. It is unpretentious fun at its best. Is it a great film? No. Is it an entertaining film? Yes. If you want to watch a time-pass, entertaining film, Wanted is just for you. If you want a movie where you need your gray matter to work, sit at home and enjoy something else. Why bother going to the theater and whine later.

Mohandas – A Man Lost in his Own Nation

“Fake lives are real and the real does not even exist.”

I heard about the movie Mohandas a few months back. I searched on Youtube and after playing with the keywords for a while, finally found the trailer. I was interested as I loved Mazhar Kamran’s work in Satya. After finding the trailer interesting, I kept waiting to hear more about the movie from someone on PFC. Sadly, no one recommended. Nor did anyone talk about the movie. Last week I came to know the movie is releasing on 4^th September. I was worried whether the movie will release in Bangalore or not. Thankfully it did. It is running 2 shows in entire Bangalore. Talk about fate of Hindi indie films in India!

The film tells the story of Mohandas, a brilliant student despite economic backwardness and how his life turns topsy-turvy when he finds out someone impersonified him and is working in the coal mines instead of him. His story is then sent to a news channel based in Delhi and how a journalist tries to uncover the truth.

Mohandas revives the cinema of the late 70s and early 80s when movies talked about social inequities and had something to say. It looks really different than the rest of the Hindi movies just because of the landscape. The barren lands, the coal mines, the dust, the poverty all adds up to create an atmosphere of frustration just like the protagonist is experiencing.

There is a scene in the movie when Mohandas says, “Woh kagaz kahan se laoon, jo yeh baat bataae, ki main hi main hoon." And then you see the despair in his eyes and the camera shifts to the all the other characters present there and no one has an answer. That makes the movie scary and very topical. Identity theft is a very serious issue in the internet age and several instances have been found. The movie which talks about it is located in a village in Madhya Pradesh which probably does not have electricity.

The beauty of the film lies in its story. Here there is a movie which has a story to tell. You get deeply engrossed into the movie as it progresses. It is like slow burn. As the movie progresses, one feels the frustration, anger, despair of the protagonist. The rustic color palette that the movie uses due to the real locations is so different than the regular Hindi movies we see, that it becomes a character of its own.

The characterization in the movie is also very realistic. We see a lot of people with gray shades for a change. There is a local journalist who is interested in Mohandas’ case as it might help him get a break into national television. Although the local people talks about Mohandas’ case, no one is interested to really help him out.

Towards the end of the film, after the verdict is given, the cast breaks into song and dance mode. It kind of comes out of place in context of the movie and I was wondering why on earth the director added this. Thankfully the movie does not end there and the reality prevails. The movie ends brilliantly. It feels like a tight slap on the face. Although it might feel pessimistic, it is actually closer to reality.

Coming to technicalities, the cinematography is really good. But we expect that from Mazhar Kamran. There were two instances where it went out of focus, but I think it was the flaw of the projection. The background score (and sometimes the lack of it) adds to the mood of the movie. Since real locations have been used, it looks very believable. However, one scene at the beginning of the movie which shows Sonali Kulkarni’s apartment is very unrealistic. How come she, a journalist live in such a posh apartment? Even if she does, the color choices of the interior decor are cringe worthy. There are instances in the first half where the pace slackens and probably needs a little bit of editing. The flaskback of Mohandas’ childhood is very clichéd. Similar scenes of poor child shining in school have been shown umpteenth times.

Coming to performances, Mohandas has an ensemble cast. Nakul Vaid underplays the role beautifully. His eyes do show the pain. Sonali Kulkarni is good. Aditya Shrivastav as always is brilliant. Uttam Halder, someone I never saw before is really good as the local journalist. Govind Namdeo, Sushant Singh and Akhilendra Mishra are competent. Sharbani Mukherjee falters to some extent. I thought she didn’t look the part. Also the way she speaks is unconvincing.

Mohandas is a rare Hindi movie which dares to speak something different. It is an independent movie in the true sense. It makes a very strong socio-political statement of the current times.

It is flawed. But then flawed brilliance is still brilliant, right?

Post Script:

One noted film critic (or not) while reviewing Mohandas has said, “…not all stories have the potential to be adapted for the big screen. Mohandas suffers due to this reason.”

There were 7 people in the theater other than me. Except for one guy, I don’t think anyone was even remotely interested in watching the movie. I could overhear popcorn discussions frequently.

While coming out there was huge rush as Fox also finished next door. The discussions were detailed analysis of the northern and southern hemisphere of Udita Goswami and what cars Arjun Rampal drove. Within moments of coming out of the theater, it felt like another India.

Wake Up!

Shattered Dreams

Secluded for ages
Don't know what to do
Life's been an abusive pain

Traveled the dark alleys of drugs
Thought they will provide sunshine
Instead took me to another cosmos
So brutal; Left me battered

Self mutilation was the only way out
Looked around for inspiration
Found it; Two slices on the wrist
A surging pain of relief

Quarter of a life flashed
Thought will see only nightmares
Wait! The images I recall are of joy
Is this what life has been?

Confused. Why now?
Do I want a second chance?
But it's too late
All I see is darkness ahead

Eyes open. I see blood all around
I am cowardice personified
Never tried hard for anything in life
Yet complained, "Amores Perros"

Wake Up!
It's never too late
Wake Up!
Redemption tastes good, always

Antaheen – Longing For Love

http://passionforcinema.com/antaheen-%E2%80%93-the-longs-for-love/

‘Antaheen’ is a collage of love stories, without saying the most abused phrase in Hindi (or Indian) cinema ‘I love you’ even once. Perhaps that is why I identified with it so much. The love shown here seems real, one that can happen in our lives and change them forever. Love comes in many different ways at various points of the lives of the characters in ‘Antaheen’. Love is watching Kolkata in the rains, a de-familiarized landscape. Love is Persian poet Rumi’s love poem written on the glass divider and rain drops falling on it. Love is talking about a kite trapped in an antenna. Love is also patiently waiting for the phone to ring so that one can hear the voice of the unknown caller. Love is also a phone call to one’s separated wife and requesting her if he can come over and stay with her for a few days just to feel that emotional attachment and the sense of belonging. Love is also a nod from a busy and indifferent businessman to his servant to give his wife medicine, when she suffers from migraine.

Moments like these make ‘Antaheen’. It is in all these fragments that we understand the totality of love in this film.

I enjoy discussing the craft of the movie more than the story line or the entertainment quotient. ‘Antaheen’ gives ample opportunity to do that. Let’s start with cinematography. Abhik Mukhopadhyay, I believe, is currently the best cinematographer in India. His work in ‘Bhalo Theko’ is a testament to that statement. I think he outperforms himself in ‘Antaheen’. Kolkata has never looked so up-market, chic and romantic. The sky scrapers, view of the city from the high rises, roads and traffic jam amidst rain, clouds, indoors all add up to give Kolkata a new look for viewers. The songs are wonderfully shot and for once the lyrics and the shots merge perfectly.

The editing compliments the cinematography perfectly. There are frames where the camera lingers on for couple of seconds more before its transition to the next scene which makes them extra special. The pace is slow. But that is ideal for a movie like this. It is almost a contrast to the fast paced urban life in the movie. I think the slow pacing is deliberate to bring out the pathos of loneliness in the middle of urbanity.

The soundtrack of ‘Antaheen’ is the best Bengali soundtrack I have heard this entire decade (or more). The songs with their picturization are special, especially ‘Jao Pakhi’. Also, the songs merge into the narrative very smoothly.

Aniruddha Roychowdhury’s direction deserves merit. He previously made ‘Anuranan’ (Resonance), a film that dealt with urban relationships. Although I liked that film, somewhere down the line I felt it was a little hurried, especially at the end. In ‘Antaheen’ he gets it right. It ends hitting the perfect note. There are many sub-plots in the movie and he handles most of them brilliantly. ‘Antaheen’ is very emotional movie and to sustain the emotional quotient till the very end is commendable. He also extracts great performances from the cast especially the newcomers.

Talking about performances, Antaheen has a stellar star cast with performers like Aparna Sen, Sharmila Tagore and Rahul Bose. There are also two debutants, Radhika Apte and Kalyan Roy. Let’s talk about the debutants first. Both Radhika Apte and Kalyan Roy are phenomenal. They are so good that one forgets about Aparna Sen and Rahul Bose although they have similar screen time as the debutants. Radhika Apte’s eyes speak a thousand words. Her performance is one of the most spontaneous performances in recent times. Kalyan Roy as the laidback, separated husband who loves books, foreign wines and Sensex is equally brilliant. It is the star performers who falter to an extent. Rahul Bose is his usual self. Also, his one dimensional character didn’t help. Aparna Sen on the other hand has an interesting role. I don’t think she played a corporate lady before. It's a new look for her too. Yet, she looks a tad tired with her performance. Sharmila Tagore is wasted in a small role. Except one scene where she talks about her story, all she does is bring Jasmine tea.

The biggest flaw of the movie is the endorsements which keep coming in almost every frame of the movie like a pop-up. It becomes an irritant and makes some scenes a laughing stock. Also certain scenes went a little overboard and became melodramatic. Rahul Bose quoting Jim Morrison in a hostage situation is hard to digest.

The movie becomes the journey of all the characters on a self discovery trip and long for love. Some end alone, some together. But the longing remains.